Spatial mismatch between wild bee diversity hotspots and protected areas

被引:8
|
作者
Casanelles-Abella, Joan [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Fontana, Simone [3 ,4 ]
Meier, Eliane [5 ]
Moretti, Marco [1 ]
Fournier, Betrand [6 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Forest Snow & Landscape Res WSL, Biodivers & Conservat Biol, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Terr Ecosyst, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Freiburg, Nat Conservat & Landscape Ecol, Freiburg, Germany
[4] Kanton St Gallen, Abt Nat & Landschaft, Amt Nat Jagd & Fischerei, Kanton St Gallen,, St Gallen, Switzerland
[5] Agroscope, Agroecol & Environm, Zurich, Switzerland
[6] Univ Potsdam, Inst Environm Sci & Geog, Potsdam, Germany
[7] Swiss Fed Inst Forest Snow & Landscape Res WSL, Biodivers & Conservat Biol, Zurcherstr 111, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”; 瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Anthophila; biodiversity facet; community-based conservation; elevation gradient; protected area; Switzerland; urbanization; FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY; BETA-DIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; RICHNESS; PATTERNS; GRADIENT; MODELS;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.14082
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Wild bees are critical for multiple ecosystem functions but are currently threatened. Understanding the determinants of the spatial distribution of wild bee diversity is a major research gap for their conservation. We modeled wild bee a and ss taxonomic and functional diversity in Switzerland to uncover countrywide diversity patterns and determine the extent to which they provide complementary information, assess the importance of the different drivers structuring wild bee diversity, identify hotspots of wild bee diversity, and determine the overlap between diversity hotspots and the network of protected areas. We used site-level occurrence and trait data from 547 wild bee species across 3343 plots and calculated community attributes, including taxonomic diversity metrics, community mean trait values, and functional diversity metrics. We modeled their distribution with predictors describing gradients of climate, resource availability (vegetation), and anthropogenic influence (i.e., land-use types and beekeeping intensity). Wild bee diversity changed along gradients of climate and resource availability; high-elevation areas had lower functional and taxonomic a diversity, and xeric areas harbored more diverse bee communities. Functional and taxonomic ss diversities diverged from this pattern, with high elevations hosting unique species and trait combinations. The proportion of diversity hotspots included in protected areas depended on the biodiversity facet, but most diversity hotspots occurred in unprotected land. Climate and resource availability gradients drove spatial patterns of wild bee diversity, resulting in lower overall diversity at higher elevations, but simultaneously greater taxonomic and functional uniqueness. This spatial mismatch among distinct biodiversity facets and the degree of overlap with protected areas is a challenge to wild bee conservation, especially in the face of global change, and calls for better integrating unprotected land. The application of spatial predictive models represents a valuable tool to aid the future development of protected areas and achieve wild bee conservation goals.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Diversity, Features, and Challenges of Managing Urban Protected Areas, the Case of Croatia
    Markovic Vukadin, Izidora
    Dolenc, Nika
    Opacic, Vuk Tvrtko
    TOURISM PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT, 2024,
  • [32] Identifying predictors of species diversity to guide designation of marine protected areas
    Hodge, Brooke C.
    Pendleton, Daniel E.
    Ganley, Laura C.
    O'Brien, Orfhlaith
    Kraus, Scott D.
    Quintana-Rizzo, Ester
    Redfern, Jessica, V
    CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2022, 4 (05)
  • [33] High Bee and Wasp Diversity in a Heterogeneous Tropical Farming System Compared to Protected Forest
    Schueepp, Christof
    Rittiner, Sarah
    Entling, Martin H.
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (12):
  • [34] Heterogeneous urban green areas are bird diversity hotspots: insights using continental-scale citizen science data
    Callaghan, Corey T.
    Bino, Gilad
    Major, Richard E.
    Martin, John M.
    Lyons, Mitchell B.
    Kingsford, Richard T.
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2019, 34 (06) : 1231 - 1246
  • [35] Species, trophic, and functional diversity in marine protected and non-protected areas
    Villamor, Adriana
    Becerro, Mikel A.
    JOURNAL OF SEA RESEARCH, 2012, 73 : 109 - 116
  • [36] Diversity of Tabanidae, Asilidae and Syrphidae (Diptera) in natural protected areas of Yucatan, Mexico
    Martin-Park, Abdiel
    Delfin-Gonzalez, Hugo
    Sosenski, Paula
    Reyes-Novelo, Enrique
    Melendez-Ramirez, Virginia
    Navarrete-Carballo, Juan
    Ibanez-Bernal, Sergio
    Dzul-Manzanilla, Felipe
    Gonzalez-Moreno, Alejandra
    Manrique-Saide, Pablo
    JOURNAL OF INSECT CONSERVATION, 2018, 22 (01) : 85 - 97
  • [37] Bats of Borneo: diversity, distributions and representation in protected areas
    Struebig, Matthew J.
    Christy, Lenny
    Pio, Dorothea
    Meijaard, Erik
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2010, 19 (02) : 449 - 469
  • [38] Conservation priorities in the Southern Central Andes: mismatch between endemism and diversity hotspots in the regional flora
    Ana C. Godoy-Bürki
    Pablo Ortega-Baes
    Jesús M. Sajama
    Lone Aagesen
    Biodiversity and Conservation, 2014, 23 : 81 - 107
  • [39] The mismatch between location of protected areas and suitable habitat for the Vulnerable taruka Hippocamelus antisensis
    Mata, Cristina
    Fuentes-Allende, Nicolas
    Malo, Juan E.
    Vielma, Andre
    Gonzalez, Benito A.
    ORYX, 2019, 53 (04) : 752 - 756
  • [40] Conservation priorities in the Southern Central Andes: mismatch between endemism and diversity hotspots in the regional flora
    Godoy-Buerki, Ana C.
    Ortega-Baes, Pablo
    Sajama, Jesus M.
    Aagesen, Lone
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2014, 23 (01) : 81 - 107