Assessing the net benefit of machine learning models in the presence of resource constraints

被引:6
作者
Singh, Karandeep [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,7 ]
Shah, Nigam H. [5 ]
Vickers, Andrew J. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Learning Hlth Sci, Med Sch, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Internal Med, Med Sch, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Urol, Med Sch, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Sch Informat, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Stanford Ctr Biomed Informat Res, Stanford, CA USA
[6] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY USA
[7] 1161H NIB, 300 N Ingalls St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
machine learning; net benefit; resource constraints; PREDICTION; MEDICINE;
D O I
10.1093/jamia/ocad006
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Objective The objective of this study is to provide a method to calculate model performance measures in the presence of resource constraints, with a focus on net benefit (NB). Materials and Methods To quantify a model's clinical utility, the Equator Network's TRIPOD guidelines recommend the calculation of the NB, which reflects whether the benefits conferred by intervening on true positives outweigh the harms conferred by intervening on false positives. We refer to the NB achievable in the presence of resource constraints as the realized net benefit (RNB), and provide formulae for calculating the RNB. Results Using 4 case studies, we demonstrate the degree to which an absolute constraint (eg, only 3 available intensive care unit [ICU] beds) diminishes the RNB of a hypothetical ICU admission model. We show how the introduction of a relative constraint (eg, surgical beds that can be converted to ICU beds for very high-risk patients) allows us to recoup some of the RNB but with a higher penalty for false positives. Discussion RNB can be calculated in silico before the model's output is used to guide care. Accounting for the constraint changes the optimal strategy for ICU bed allocation. Conclusions This study provides a method to account for resource constraints when planning model-based interventions, either to avoid implementations where constraints are expected to play a larger role or to design more creative solutions (eg, converted ICU beds) to overcome absolute constraints when possible.
引用
收藏
页码:668 / 673
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] The Proliferation of Reports on Clinical Scoring Systems Issues About Uptake and Clinical Utility
    Challener, Douglas W.
    Prokop, Larry J.
    Abu-Saleh, Omar
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 321 (24): : 2405 - 2406
  • [2] A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models
    Christodoulou, Evangelia
    Ma, Jie
    Collins, Gary S.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Verbakel, Jan Y.
    Van Calster, Ben
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 110 : 12 - 22
  • [3] Collins GS, 2015, ANN INTERN MED, V162, P55, DOI [10.1136/bmj.g7594, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.010, 10.7326/M14-0697, 10.1038/bjc.2014.639, 10.7326/M14-0698, 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.025, 10.1186/s12916-014-0241-z, 10.1002/bjs.9736]
  • [4] Artificial Intelligence in Health Care Will the Value Match the Hype?
    Emanuel, Ezekiel J.
    Wachter, Robert M.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 321 (23): : 2281 - 2282
  • [5] Decision Curve Analysis
    Fitzgerald, Mark
    Saville, Benjamin R.
    Lewis, Roger J.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 313 (04): : 409 - 410
  • [6] GAFNI A, 1994, HEALTH SERV RES, V29, P207
  • [7] Generalizability of Cardiovascular Disease Clinical Prediction Models: 158 Independent External Validations of 104 Unique Models
    Gulati, Gaurav
    Upshaw, Jenica
    Wessler, Benjamin S.
    Brazil, Riley J.
    Nelson, Jason
    van Klaveren, David
    Lundquist, Christine M.
    Park, Jinny G.
    McGinnes, Hannah
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Van Calster, Ben
    Kent, David M.
    [J]. CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2022, 15 (04): : 248 - 260
  • [8] A framework for making predictive models useful in practice
    Jung, Kenneth
    Kashyap, Sehj
    Avati, Anand
    Harman, Stephanie
    Shaw, Heather
    Li, Ron
    Smith, Margaret
    Shum, Kenny
    Javitz, Jacob
    Vetteth, Yohan
    Seto, Tina
    Bagley, Steven C.
    Shah, Nigam H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2021, 28 (06) : 1149 - 1158
  • [9] Assessing the Clinical Impact of Risk Prediction Models With Decision Curves: Guidance for Correct Interpretation and Appropriate Use
    Kerr, Kathleen F.
    Brown, Marshall D.
    Zhu, Kehao
    Janes, Holly
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (21) : 2534 - +
  • [10] Beyond the Usual Prediction Accuracy Metrics: Reporting Results for Clinical Decision Making
    Localio, A. Russell
    Goodman, Steven
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 157 (04) : 294 - +