Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the achievement emotions questionnaire for physical education in university students

被引:0
|
作者
Tian, Jianing [1 ]
Liu, Peifeng [2 ]
Zhang, Qianqian [1 ]
Song, Shun [1 ]
An, Shicheng [1 ]
Yu, Hongyan [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Phys Educ, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Dept Phys Educ, Changsha 410083, Peoples R China
关键词
Achievement emotions; Physical education; University students; Reliability; Validity; Measurement invariance; ACADEMIC EMOTIONS; FIT INDEXES; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-023-16759-5
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundAchievement emotions have a significant impact on both the learning process and outcomes. However, there is currently no brief and effective questionnaire available to evaluate Chinese university students' achievement emotions in physical education courses. This study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of the Achievement Emotions for Physical Education Questionnaire (AEQ-PE) in a sample of Chinese university students, while also investigating its measurement invariance across gender and grade levels.MethodsA cluster randomization sampling method was used to select 694 first- and second-year university students in Shanghai, China for the survey. Descriptive statistics, item analysis, reliability testing, and measurement invariance testing were conducted on the full sample (n = 694). Subsequently, the full sample was randomly divided into two groups, with Sample 1 (n = 347) undergoing exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and Sample 2 (n = 347) undergoing confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to test the structural validity, convergent validity, and discriminant validity of the Chinese version of the Achievement Emotions Questionnaire for Physical Education (AEQ-PE-C). Finally, Sample 3 (n = 45), which was retested one month later, was used to evaluate test-retest reliability.ResultsThe Chinese version of the Achievement Emotions Questionnaire for Physical Education consists of 6 dimensions and 24 items, with good item discrimination. The EFA supported a 6-factor structure model, while the CFA demonstrated good model fit indices (& chi;2/df = 3.086, CFI = 0.928, TLI = 0.916, RMSEA = 0.078) and good convergent and discriminant validity. The questionnaire exhibits high internal consistency reliability (0.794) and excellent test-retest reliability (0.792). Furthermore, the multi-group analysis confirms that the AEQ-PE-C questionnaire has measurement invariance across gender and grade levels.ConclusionThe Chinese version of the Achievement Emotions Questionnaire for Physical Education has good reliability and validity, as well as measurement invariance across gender and grade levels, making it an effective tool for measuring achievement emotions in physical education among Chinese university students.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Physical Workload Questionnaire
    Kahraman, Turhan
    Goz, Evrim
    Genc, Arzu
    WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2018, 59 (02): : 295 - 302
  • [22] The Chinese version of the physical activity questionnaire for adolescents: a psychometric validity, reliability, and invariance study
    Qin, Ling
    Ho, Walter King Yan
    Khoo, Selina
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [23] Validation of the Chinese version of the Achievement Emotions Questionnaire-Elementary School
    Zhou, Lihua
    Wu, Ying
    SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2021, 49 (05):
  • [24] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE CHINESE VERSION OF THE PERSONALITY DIAGNOSTIC QUESTIONNAIRE-4+: A STUDY WITH CHINESE COLLEGE STUDENTS
    Ling, Hui
    Qian, Ming-yi
    Yang, Bing-jun
    SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2010, 38 (03): : 311 - 320
  • [25] VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR PHYSICAL THERAPY STUDENTS' ATTITUDES TOWARD THEIR PROFESSION AND EDUCATION (Q-PTSAPE)
    Tasvuran Horata, Emel
    Kalkan, Serpil
    Taskin, Gulsen
    Tedla, Jaya Shanker
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY REHABILITATION-TURK FIZYOTERAPI VE REHABILITASYON DERGISI, 2022, 33 (03): : 219 - 226
  • [26] THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF COGNITIVE FAILURES QUESTIONNAIRE IN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
    Ekici, Gamze
    Uysal, Songul Atasavun
    Altuntas, Onur
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY REHABILITATION-TURK FIZYOTERAPI VE REHABILITASYON DERGISI, 2016, 27 (02): : 55 - 60
  • [27] The validity and reliability of the simplified Chinese version of the Social Communication Questionnaire
    Liu, Si-Yu
    Wang, Xin
    Chen, Qiang
    Chen, Jia-Jie
    Jin, Cheng-Kai
    Zhan, Xiao-Ling
    Guo, Cui-Hua
    Li, Xiu-Hong
    Lin, Li-Zi
    Jing, Jin
    AUTISM RESEARCH, 2022, 15 (09) : 1732 - 1741
  • [28] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Athletes' Received Support Questionnaire
    Ren, Yilin
    Chu, Kequn
    Zhu, Fengshu
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [29] Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Young Positive Schema Questionnaire
    Chi, Danni
    Du, Xiangju
    Ma, Hong
    Wang, Yubo
    Zhang, Yuanyuan
    Zhong, Haiyun
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [30] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of heart disease fact questionnaire
    Lee, Kam-Hung
    Shiu, Ann Tak-Ying
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2012, 21 (13-14) : 2094 - 2096