Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the achievement emotions questionnaire for physical education in university students

被引:0
|
作者
Tian, Jianing [1 ]
Liu, Peifeng [2 ]
Zhang, Qianqian [1 ]
Song, Shun [1 ]
An, Shicheng [1 ]
Yu, Hongyan [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Phys Educ, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Dept Phys Educ, Changsha 410083, Peoples R China
关键词
Achievement emotions; Physical education; University students; Reliability; Validity; Measurement invariance; ACADEMIC EMOTIONS; FIT INDEXES; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-023-16759-5
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundAchievement emotions have a significant impact on both the learning process and outcomes. However, there is currently no brief and effective questionnaire available to evaluate Chinese university students' achievement emotions in physical education courses. This study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of the Achievement Emotions for Physical Education Questionnaire (AEQ-PE) in a sample of Chinese university students, while also investigating its measurement invariance across gender and grade levels.MethodsA cluster randomization sampling method was used to select 694 first- and second-year university students in Shanghai, China for the survey. Descriptive statistics, item analysis, reliability testing, and measurement invariance testing were conducted on the full sample (n = 694). Subsequently, the full sample was randomly divided into two groups, with Sample 1 (n = 347) undergoing exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and Sample 2 (n = 347) undergoing confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to test the structural validity, convergent validity, and discriminant validity of the Chinese version of the Achievement Emotions Questionnaire for Physical Education (AEQ-PE-C). Finally, Sample 3 (n = 45), which was retested one month later, was used to evaluate test-retest reliability.ResultsThe Chinese version of the Achievement Emotions Questionnaire for Physical Education consists of 6 dimensions and 24 items, with good item discrimination. The EFA supported a 6-factor structure model, while the CFA demonstrated good model fit indices (& chi;2/df = 3.086, CFI = 0.928, TLI = 0.916, RMSEA = 0.078) and good convergent and discriminant validity. The questionnaire exhibits high internal consistency reliability (0.794) and excellent test-retest reliability (0.792). Furthermore, the multi-group analysis confirms that the AEQ-PE-C questionnaire has measurement invariance across gender and grade levels.ConclusionThe Chinese version of the Achievement Emotions Questionnaire for Physical Education has good reliability and validity, as well as measurement invariance across gender and grade levels, making it an effective tool for measuring achievement emotions in physical education among Chinese university students.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the achievement emotions questionnaire for physical education in university students
    Jianing Tian
    Peifeng Liu
    Qianqian Zhang
    Shun Song
    Shicheng An
    Hongyan Yu
    BMC Public Health, 23
  • [2] Reliability and Validity of the Achievement Emotions Questionnaire. A Study of Argentinean University Students
    Veronica Paoloni, Paola
    Beatriz Vaja, Arabela
    Lilian Munoz, Veronica
    ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 12 (03) : 671 - 692
  • [3] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the mental vulnerability questionnaire for the undergraduate students
    Gong, Yuxin
    Liu, Kun
    Hu, Na
    Sun, Mengyuan
    Huang, Mina
    PERSPECTIVES IN PSYCHIATRIC CARE, 2020, 56 (02) : 409 - 414
  • [4] Reliability and Validity of a Computerized and Chinese Version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire
    Su, Wentao
    Xu, Xia
    ICAIE 2009: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND EDUCATION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 768 - 771
  • [5] Reliability and Validity Study of the Turkish Version of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire for University Students
    Kuru, Tacettin
    Karadere, Mehmet
    Burhan, Huseyin
    Safak, Yasir
    PSYCHIATRY AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2021, 11 (01): : 18 - 24
  • [6] Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Food-Mood Questionnaire for university students
    Cin, Nazli Nur Aslan
    Seref, Betul
    Ozcelik, Ayse Ozfer
    Atav, Serdar
    Begdache, Lina
    PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2022, 25 (04) : 841 - 849
  • [7] Turkish version of Facebook Jealousy Questionnaire: reliability and validity studies on university students
    Demirtas-Madran, H. Andac
    ANADOLU PSIKIYATRI DERGISI-ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 17 : 93 - 99
  • [8] Reliability and validity evaluation of the chinese version of the ethical sensitivity questionnaire for nursing students
    Yu, Haitao
    Tong, Tong
    Gao, Ye
    Zhang, Hui
    Tong, Huijuan
    Liang, Chunguang
    BMC NURSING, 2021, 20 (01)
  • [9] The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Metacognitions about Health Questionnaire in college students
    Dai, Lisha
    Bailey, Robin
    Deng, Yunlong
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2018, 27 (04) : 1099 - 1108
  • [10] The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Metacognitions about Health Questionnaire in college students
    Lisha Dai
    Robin Bailey
    Yunlong Deng
    Quality of Life Research, 2018, 27 : 1099 - 1108