Real-Time Seismic Intensity Measurements Prediction for Earthquake Early Warning: A Systematic Literature Review

被引:7
作者
Cheng, Zhenpeng [1 ]
Peng, Chaoyong [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Meirong [1 ]
机构
[1] China Earthquake Adm, Inst Geophys, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] China Earthquake Adm, Key Lab Earthquake Source Phys, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
基金
北京市自然科学基金;
关键词
earthquake early warning; intensity measurements; point source model; finite fault; wavefield; NUMERICAL SHAKE PREDICTION; GROUND-MOTION PREDICTIONS; RUPTURE DETECTOR FINDER; M-W; PACIFIC COAST; ALGORITHM; PERFORMANCE; MAGNITUDE; ROBUST; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.3390/s23115052
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
With the gradual development of and improvement in earthquake early warning systems (EEWS), more accurate real-time seismic intensity measurements (IMs) methods are needed to assess the impact range of earthquake intensities. Although traditional point source warning systems have made some progress in terms of predicting earthquake source parameters, they are still inadequate at assessing the accuracy of IMs predictions. In this paper, we aim to explore the current state of the field by reviewing real-time seismic IMs methods. First, we analyze different views on the ultimate earthquake magnitude and rupture initiation behavior. Then, we summarize the progress of IMs predictions as they relate to regional and field warnings. The applications of finite faults and simulated seismic wave fields in IMs predictions are analyzed. Finally, the methods used to evaluate IMs are discussed in terms of the accuracy of the IMs measured by different algorithms and the cost of alerts. The trend of IMs prediction methods in real time is diversified, and the integration of various types of warning algorithms and of various configurations of seismic station equipment in an integrated earthquake warning network is an important development trend for future EEWS construction.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 109 条
[1]   Summary of the Abrahamson & Silva NGA ground-motion relations [J].
Abrahamson, Norman ;
Silva, Walter .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2008, 24 (01) :67-97
[2]   A study on warning algorithms for Istanbul earthquake early warning system [J].
Alcik, Hakan ;
Ozel, Oguz ;
Apaydin, Nurdan ;
Erdik, Mustafa .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2009, 36
[3]   Global growth of earthquake early warning Public-private partnerships provide a method for vastly expanding sensor networks [J].
Allen, Richard M. ;
Stogaitis, Marc .
SCIENCE, 2022, 375 (6582) :717-718
[4]   Earthquake Early Warning: Advances, Scientific Challenges, and Societal Needs [J].
Allen, Richard M. ;
Melgar, Diego .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCES, VOL 47, 2019, 47 :361-+
[5]  
Alphonsa A, 2016, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, SIGNAL PROCESSING AND NETWORKING (WISPNET), P1201, DOI 10.1109/WiSPNET.2016.7566327
[6]   MOWLAS: NIED observation network for earthquake, tsunami and volcano [J].
Aoi, Shin ;
Asano, Youichi ;
Kunugi, Takashi ;
Kimura, Takeshi ;
Uehira, Kenji ;
Takahashi, Narumi ;
Ueda, Hideki ;
Shiomi, Katsuhiko ;
Matsumoto, Takumi ;
Fujiwara, Hiroyuki .
EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE, 2020, 72 (01)
[7]   Finite-Fault Rupture Detector (FinDer): Going Real-Time in Californian ShakeAlert Warning System [J].
Boese, M. ;
Felizardo, C. ;
Heaton, T. H. .
SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2015, 86 (06) :1692-1704
[8]   Rapid Estimation of Earthquake Source and Ground-Motion Parameters for Earthquake Early Warning Using Data from a Single Three-Component Broadband or Strong-Motion Sensor [J].
Boese, M. ;
Heaton, T. ;
Hauksson, E. .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2012, 102 (02) :738-750
[9]   Real-time testing of the on-site warning algorithm in southern California and its performance during the July 29 2008 Mw5.4 Chino Hills earthquake [J].
Boese, M. ;
Hauksson, E. ;
Solanki, K. ;
Kanamori, H. ;
Heaton, T. H. .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2009, 36
[10]   Real-time Finite Fault Rupture Detector (FinDer) for large earthquakes [J].
Boese, Maren ;
Heaton, Thomas H. ;
Hauksson, Egill .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 191 (02) :803-812