Forensic DNA extraction methods for human hard tissue: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of technologies and sample type

被引:26
作者
Finaughty, Chandra [1 ,4 ]
Heathfield, Laura Jane [2 ]
Kemp, Victoria [1 ]
Marquez-Grant, Nicholas [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cranfield Univ, Cranfield Forens Inst, Cranfield Def & Secur, Cranfield, Beds, England
[2] Univ Cape Town, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Pathol, Div Forens Med & Toxicol, Cape Town, South Africa
[3] Cranfield Univ, Cranfield Forens Inst, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England
[4] Kings Coll London, Inst Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Analyt Environm & Forens Sci, Kings Forens, London, England
基金
加拿大创新基金会;
关键词
Systematic Review; DNA extraction; Bone; Teeth; Forensic DNA identification; SKELETAL REMAINS; BONE REMAINS; IDENTIFICATION; TEETH; PURIFICATION; RECOVERY; CADAVERS; VICTIMS; ANCIENT; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.fsigen.2022.102818
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
DNA identification of human remains has a valuable role in the field of forensic science and wider. Although DNA is vital in identification of unknown human remains, post-mortem environmental factors can lead to poor mo-lecular preservation. In this respect, focus has been placed on DNA extraction methodologies for hard tissue samples, as these are the longest surviving. Despite decades of research being conducted on DNA extraction methods for bone and teeth, little consensus has been reached as to the best performing. Therefore, the aim of this study was to conduct a thorough systematic literature review to identify potential DNA extraction technique (s) which perform optimally for forensic DNA profiling from hard tissue samples. PRISMA guidelines were used, by which a search strategy was developed. This included identifying databases and discipline specific journals, keywords, and exclusion and inclusion criteria. In total, 175 articles were identified that detailed over 50 different DNA extraction methodologies. Results of the meta-analysis conducted on 41 articles - meeting further inclusion criteria -showed that statistically significant higher DNA profiling success was associated with solid -phase magnetic bead/resin methods. In addition, incorporating a demineralisation pre-step resulted in signifi-cantly higher profiling successes. For hard tissue type, bone outperformed teeth, and even though dense cortical femur samples were more frequently used across the studies, profiling success was comparable, and in some cases, higher in cancellous bone samples. Notably, incomplete data sharing resulted in many studies being excluded, thus an emphasis for minimum reporting standards is made. In conclusion, this study identifies stra-tegies that may improve success rates of forensic DNA profiling from hard tissue samples. Finally, continued improvements to current methods can ensure faster times to resolution and restoring the identity of those who died in obscurity.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 54 条
[41]   Prediction of autosomal STR typing success in ancient and Second World War bone samples [J].
Pajnic, Irena Zupanic ;
Zupanc, Tomaz ;
Balazic, Joze ;
Gersak, Ziva Miriam ;
Stojkovic, Oliver ;
Skadric, Ivan ;
Cresnar, Matija .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS, 2017, 27 :17-26
[42]   DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG): Recommendations regarding the role of forensic genetics for disaster victim identification (DVI) [J].
Prinz, M. ;
Carracedo, A. ;
Mayr, W. R. ;
Morling, N. ;
Parsons, T. J. ;
Sajantila, A. ;
Scheithauer, R. ;
Schmitter, H. ;
Schneider, P. M. .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS, 2007, 1 (01) :3-12
[43]   Intrinsic and extrinsic factors that may influence DNA preservation in skeletal remains: A review [J].
Raffone, Caterina ;
Baeta, Miriam ;
Lambacher, Nicole ;
Granizo-Rodriguez, Eva ;
Etxeberria, Francisco ;
de Pancorbo, Marian M. .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 325
[44]   Procedures to recover DNA from pre-molar and molar teeth of decomposed cadavers with different post-mortem intervals [J].
Raimann, Paulo E. ;
Picanco, Juliane B. ;
Silva, Deborah S. B. S. ;
Albuquerque, Tricia C. K. ;
Paludo, Francis Jackson O. ;
Alho, Clarice S. .
ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (11) :1459-1466
[45]   Comparison of Two Methods for Isolating DNA from Human Skeletal Remains for STR Analysis [J].
Rucinski, Cynthia ;
Malaver, Ayda L. ;
Yunis, Emilio J. ;
Yunis, Juan J. .
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2012, 57 (03) :706-712
[46]   Naming the dead: DNA-based identification of historical remains as an act of care [J].
Scully, Jackie Leach .
NEW GENETICS AND SOCIETY, 2014, 33 (03) :313-332
[47]   Which tissue to take? A retrospective study of the identification success of altered human remains [J].
Senst, Alina ;
Scheurer, Eva ;
Gerlach, Kathrin ;
Schulz, Iris .
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC AND LEGAL MEDICINE, 2021, 84
[48]   Challenges with co-amplification of microbial DNA in interpretation of STR profiles obtained from human skeletal remains [J].
Smajlovic-Skenderagic, Lejla ;
Idrizbegovic, Sejla ;
Brkanic, Lejla ;
Bilic, Ana ;
Huel, Rene ;
Parsons, Thomas J. .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS, 2021, 51
[49]   Identification process of skeletal remains from mass graves: Our experience and proposal guidelines [J].
Sutlovic, Davorka ;
Boric, Igor ;
Zulim, Tamara ;
Vucinovic, Ana .
LEGAL MEDICINE, 2015, 17 (02) :102-108
[50]   A comparative study of two methods of dental pulp extraction for genetic fingerprinting [J].
Tilotta, Francoise ;
Brousseau, Philippe ;
Lepareur, Elise ;
Yasukawa, Kazutoyo ;
de Mazancourt, Philippe .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 202 (1-3) :E39-E43