A botanical reference set illustrating a weight of evidence approach for skin sensitization risk assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Gao, Yuan [1 ]
Ryan, Cindy A. [2 ]
Ellingson, Kim [3 ]
Krutz, Nora [4 ]
Kern, Petra S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Procter & Gamble Technol Beijing Co Ltd, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] ToxTech Solut LLC, Milan, IN USA
[3] Mason Business Ctr, Procter & Gamble, 8700 Mason Montgomery Rd, Mason, OH 45040 USA
[4] Procter & Gamble Serv Co NV, Strombeek-bever, Belgium
关键词
Botanical; Natural substance; Skin sensitization; Risk assessment; Weight of evidence (WoE); ALLERGIC CONTACT-DERMATITIS; THRESHOLD DST APPROACH; CASHEW NUT SHELL; SAFETY ASSESSMENT; POISON OAK; IVY URUSHIOL; INGREDIENTS; IDENTIFICATION; PLANTS; L;
D O I
10.1016/j.fct.2023.114413
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Recent years have seen an increase in the use of botanicals and natural substances (BNS) in consumer products such as cosmetics and household care products. Most work conducted to date to assess botanicals for human safety has focused their use as dietary supplements and thus on systemic toxicity. However, the induction of skin sensitization is a possible adverse effect of natural products in particular those that come into skin contact, especially for cosmetics that remain on the skin and are not rinsed off following use. Assessments of BNS ingredients are often challenging for a number of reasons: the BNS are complex mixtures that can be of mostly unknown composition; the composition can be highly variable even within the same plant species and dependent on how processed; the physical form of the BNS raw material can vary from a highly concentrated powdered extract to a liquid extract containing only a small percentage of the BNS; testing of the BNS raw materials in New Approach Methods (NAM) has uncertainty as these methods are often not developed or validated for complex mixtures. In this study, a reference set of 14 selected BNS which span the range of skin sensitization potential was complied. These data were used in a Weight of Evidence (WoE) approach to evaluate their skin sensitization potential with each of the data rich BNS being classified as either having strong evidence of inducing skin sensitization based on human topical use history, animal data, clinical data, composition data and NAM data, or having some but more limited (weak) evidence of inducing skin sensitization, or having strong evidence of no skin sensitization potential. When available data have sufficient potency related information, sensitization potency assessment is also provided based on WoE, classifying these BNS as either strong, moderate, or weak sensitizers, or non-sensitizers. An outline for a BNS skin sensitization risk assessment framework is proposed starting with exposure-based waiving and WoE assessment for higher exposures. In addition to demonstrating the application of the WoE approach, the reference set presented here provides a set of 'data rich' botanicals which cover a range of sensitization potencies that could be used for evaluating existing test methods or aid in the development of new predictive models for skin sensitization.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Decision-making in human and environmental risk assessment using a weight of evidence approach
    Ciffroy, Philippe
    Papadaki, Paschalina
    Faust, Michael
    Kyriakopoulou, Katerina
    Pery, Alexandre
    Roth, Nicolas
    Wilks, Martin
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2013, 221 : S21 - S21
  • [42] Application of the weight of evidence approach in EFSA's risk assessment of bisphenol A (BPA) - Was it useful?
    Castoldi, Anna
    Hart, Andy
    Croera, Cristina
    Husoy, Trine
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2014, 229 : S30 - S30
  • [43] Weight of Evidence Approach to Maritime Accident Risk Assessment Based on Bayesian Network Classifier
    Skelin, Ana Kuzmanic
    Vojkovic, Lea
    Mohovic, Dani
    Zec, Damir
    TRANSACTIONS ON MARITIME SCIENCE-TOMS, 2021, 10 (02): : 330 - 347
  • [44] A quantitative weight-of-evidence approach used in decision support for safety and risk assessment
    Rathman, J. F.
    Yang, C.
    Boyer, S.
    Hasselgren, C.
    Zhou, H.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2013, 221 : S79 - S79
  • [45] A general framework illustrating an approach to quantitative microbial food safety risk assessment
    McNab, WB
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 1998, 61 (09) : 1216 - 1228
  • [46] A REVIEW OF THE BUEHLER GUINEA-PIG SKIN SENSITIZATION TEST AND ITS USE IN A RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS FOR HUMAN SKIN SENSITIZATION
    ROBINSON, MK
    NUSAIR, TL
    FLETCHER, ER
    RITZ, HL
    TOXICOLOGY, 1990, 61 (02) : 91 - 107
  • [47] Application of in vitro skin penetration measurements to refine the quantitative skin sensitization risk assessment of methylisothiazolinone
    Rothe, Helga
    Cindy, Ryan
    Page, Leanne
    Vinall, Joanne
    Goebel, Carsten
    Scheffler, Heike
    Roper, Clive
    Toner, Frank
    Kern, Petra
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2017, 280 : S276 - S276
  • [48] Dealing with substances with no defined molecular weight in non-animal assays for skin sensitization. A comment on "Plant extracts, polymers and new approach methods: Practical experience with skin sensitization assessment
    Kolle, Susanne N.
    REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 148
  • [49] Quantitative risk assessments for dermal sensitization to fragrance ingredients: The utility of LLNA data in the weight of evidence approach to identifying thresholds
    Lalko, Jon
    Api, Anne Marie
    Politano, Valerie
    Letizia, Charlene
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2009, 189 : S238 - S238
  • [50] The skin allergy risk assessment-integrated chemical environment (SARA-ICE) defined approach to derive points of departure for skin sensitization
    Reinke, Emily N.
    Reynolds, Joe
    Gilmour, Nicola
    Reynolds, Georgia
    Strickland, Judy
    Germolec, Dori
    Allen, David G.
    Maxwell, Gavin
    Kleinstreuer, Nicole C.
    CURRENT RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY, 2025, 8