A botanical reference set illustrating a weight of evidence approach for skin sensitization risk assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Gao, Yuan [1 ]
Ryan, Cindy A. [2 ]
Ellingson, Kim [3 ]
Krutz, Nora [4 ]
Kern, Petra S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Procter & Gamble Technol Beijing Co Ltd, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] ToxTech Solut LLC, Milan, IN USA
[3] Mason Business Ctr, Procter & Gamble, 8700 Mason Montgomery Rd, Mason, OH 45040 USA
[4] Procter & Gamble Serv Co NV, Strombeek-bever, Belgium
关键词
Botanical; Natural substance; Skin sensitization; Risk assessment; Weight of evidence (WoE); ALLERGIC CONTACT-DERMATITIS; THRESHOLD DST APPROACH; CASHEW NUT SHELL; SAFETY ASSESSMENT; POISON OAK; IVY URUSHIOL; INGREDIENTS; IDENTIFICATION; PLANTS; L;
D O I
10.1016/j.fct.2023.114413
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Recent years have seen an increase in the use of botanicals and natural substances (BNS) in consumer products such as cosmetics and household care products. Most work conducted to date to assess botanicals for human safety has focused their use as dietary supplements and thus on systemic toxicity. However, the induction of skin sensitization is a possible adverse effect of natural products in particular those that come into skin contact, especially for cosmetics that remain on the skin and are not rinsed off following use. Assessments of BNS ingredients are often challenging for a number of reasons: the BNS are complex mixtures that can be of mostly unknown composition; the composition can be highly variable even within the same plant species and dependent on how processed; the physical form of the BNS raw material can vary from a highly concentrated powdered extract to a liquid extract containing only a small percentage of the BNS; testing of the BNS raw materials in New Approach Methods (NAM) has uncertainty as these methods are often not developed or validated for complex mixtures. In this study, a reference set of 14 selected BNS which span the range of skin sensitization potential was complied. These data were used in a Weight of Evidence (WoE) approach to evaluate their skin sensitization potential with each of the data rich BNS being classified as either having strong evidence of inducing skin sensitization based on human topical use history, animal data, clinical data, composition data and NAM data, or having some but more limited (weak) evidence of inducing skin sensitization, or having strong evidence of no skin sensitization potential. When available data have sufficient potency related information, sensitization potency assessment is also provided based on WoE, classifying these BNS as either strong, moderate, or weak sensitizers, or non-sensitizers. An outline for a BNS skin sensitization risk assessment framework is proposed starting with exposure-based waiving and WoE assessment for higher exposures. In addition to demonstrating the application of the WoE approach, the reference set presented here provides a set of 'data rich' botanicals which cover a range of sensitization potencies that could be used for evaluating existing test methods or aid in the development of new predictive models for skin sensitization.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Determining Epidermal Disposition Kinetics for Use in an Integrated Nonanimal Approach to Skin Sensitization Risk Assessment
    Davies, Michael
    Pendlington, Ruth U.
    Page, Leanne
    Roper, Clive S.
    Sanders, David J.
    Bourner, Clare
    Pease, Camilla K.
    MacKay, Cameron
    TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 119 (02) : 308 - 318
  • [22] From theory to practice: Case studies illustrating different defined approaches for testing and assessment for skin sensitization
    Ezendam, Janine
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2016, 258 : S2 - S2
  • [23] An approach for information systems security risk assessment on fuzzy set and entropy-weight
    Fu, Yu
    Wu, Xiao-Ping
    Ye, Qing
    Peng, Xi
    Tien Tzu Hsueh Pao/Acta Electronica Sinica, 2010, 38 (07): : 1489 - 1494
  • [24] An assessment of the skin sensitisation hazard of a group of polyfunctional silicones using a weight of evidence approach
    Petry, Thomas
    Bosch, Axel
    Coste, Xavier
    Dupuis, Valerie
    Eigler, Dorothea
    Germain, Pierre
    REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2012, 64 (02) : 305 - 314
  • [25] A weight of evidence approach for bioaccumulation assessment
    Arnot, Jon A.
    Toose, Liisa
    Armitage, James M.
    Embry, Michelle
    Sangion, Alessandro
    Hughes, Lauren
    INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 19 (05) : 1235 - 1253
  • [26] Applying the skin sensitization AOP to human health risk assessment
    Maxwell, Gavin
    DRUG METABOLISM REVIEWS, 2016, 48 : 13 - 13
  • [27] Skin sensitization: Uncertainties, challenges, and opportunities for improved risk assessment
    Gilmour, Nicola
    Kimber, Ian
    Williams, Jason
    Maxwell, Gavin
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2019, 80 (03) : 195 - 200
  • [28] Skin sensitization quantitative risk assessment: A review of underlying assumptions
    Basketter, David
    Safford, Bob
    REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 74 : 105 - 116
  • [29] Skin irritation and sensitization: Mechanisms and new approaches for risk assessment
    Fluhr, J. W.
    Darlenski, R.
    Angelova-Fischer, I.
    Tsankov, N.
    Basketter, D.
    SKIN PHARMACOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 21 (03) : 124 - 135
  • [30] Quantitative risk assessment and potency in skin sensitization: quo vadem?
    Basketter, D.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2023, 384 : S32 - S32