Test-retest reliability of a mobile application of the patient reported outcomes burdens and experiences (PROBE) study

被引:0
|
作者
Curtis, Randall [1 ,13 ]
Wu, Joanne [2 ]
Iorio, Alfonso [3 ,4 ]
Frick, Neil [5 ]
Nichol, Michael [2 ]
Noone, Declan [6 ]
O'Mahony, Brian [6 ,7 ]
Page, David [8 ]
Stonebraker, Jeffrey [9 ]
Kucher, Alexandra [10 ]
Clearfield, Elizabeth [11 ]
Skinner, Mark W. [4 ,11 ]
Germini, Federico [3 ,4 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Factor VIII Comp, Berkeley, CA USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Sol Price Sch Publ Policy, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] Natl Hemophilia Fdn, New York, NY USA
[6] Irish Haemophilia Soc, Dublin, Ireland
[7] Trinity Coll Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
[8] Canadian Hemophilia Soc, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[9] North Carolina State Univ, Poole Coll Management, Raleigh, NC USA
[10] Patient Outcomes Res Grp Ltd, Washington, DC USA
[11] Inst Policy Dev Ltd, Washington, DC USA
[12] IRCCS Humanitas Res Hosp, Clin Epidemiol & Res Ctr CERC, Milan, Italy
[13] 16 Peterson Pl, Walnut Creek, CA 94595 USA
关键词
haemophilia; mobile application; patient reported outcome; quality of life; questionnaire; reliability; THERAPIES;
D O I
10.1111/hae.14969
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionThe Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens, and Experiences (PROBE) questionnaire is a patient-reported outcome tool that assesses quality of life and disease burden in people with haemophilia (PWH).AimTo assesses the test-retest reliability of PROBE when completed using the mobile phone application.MethodsWe recruited PWH, including carriers, and individuals with no bleeding disorders who attended haemophilia-related workshops or via social media. Participants completed PROBE three times (twice on the app: T1 and T2, and once on the web, T3). Test-retest reliability was analysed for T1 versus T2 (app to app, time period one) and T2 versus T3 (app to web, time period two).ResultsWe enrolled 48 participants (median age = 56 [range 27-78] years). Eighteen participants (37.5%) were PWH and seven (14.6%) were carriers. On general health domain questions, we found almost perfect agreement, except for a question on the frequency of use of pain medication in the last 12 months [Kappa coefficient (kappa) .72 and .37 for time period one and two, respectively] and any use of pain medications (kappa .75) for time period two. For haemophilia-related questions, we found substantial to perfect agreement, except for the questions on the number of joint bleeds in the previous 6 months for time period one (kappa .49) and the number of bleeds in the previous two weeks for time period two (kappa .34).ConclusionsThe results demonstrate the reliability of the PROBE app. The app can be used interchangeably with the paper and web platforms for PROBE administration.
引用
收藏
页码:702 / 708
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Test-retest properties of the Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens and Experiences (PROBE) questionnaire and its constituent domains
    Chai-Adisaksopha, Chatree
    Skinner, Mark W.
    Curtis, Randall
    Frick, Neil
    Nichol, Michael B.
    Noone, Declan
    O'Mahony, Brian
    Page, David
    Stonebraker, Jeffrey
    Thabane, Lehana
    Crowther, Mark A.
    Iorio, Alfonso
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2019, 25 (01) : 75 - 83
  • [2] Psychometric properties of the Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens and Experiences (PROBE) questionnaire
    Chai-Adisaksopha, Chatree
    Skinner, Mark W.
    Curtis, Randall
    Frick, Neil
    Nichol, Michael B.
    Noone, Declan
    O'Mahony, Brian
    Page, David
    Stonebraker, Jeffrey
    Thabane, Lehana
    Crowther, Mark
    Iorio, Alfonso
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (08):
  • [3] The Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens and Experiences (PROBE) Project: Development and evaluation of a questionnaire assessing patient reported outcomes in people with haemophilia
    Skinner M.W.
    Chai-Adisaksopha C.
    Curtis R.
    Frick N.
    Nichol M.
    Noone D.
    O'Mahony B.
    Page D.
    Stonebraker J.S.
    Iorio A.
    Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 4 (1)
  • [4] Reliability of the Norwegian version of PainDETECT: a test-retest study
    Myhre, Anette Melsom
    Strand, Liv Inger
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2023, 25 (02) : 106 - 113
  • [5] Test-retest reliability of an Android application (Protractor) for range of motion evaluation
    Elkady, Sabah Mohamed
    Elrazik, Reda Kotb Abd
    Alsaid, Hossam Mohammed
    Elhamrawy, Mohammed Youssef
    Mashaal, Ahmed
    Wahid, Amany Refaat Mohamed Abdel
    Atef, Doaa
    SPORT TK-REVISTA EUROAMERICANA DE CIENCIAS DEL DEPORTE, 2023, 12
  • [6] Test-retest reliability of the Chattecx balance system in the patient with hemiplegia
    Levine, D
    Whittle, MW
    Beach, JA
    Ollard, PG
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 1996, 33 (01): : 36 - 44
  • [7] Test-retest reliability of patient reports of low back pain
    Roach, KE
    Brown, MD
    Dunigan, KM
    Kusek, CL
    Walas, M
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1997, 26 (05) : 253 - 259
  • [8] Assessing pain in multiple sclerosis: Test-retest reliability of patient-reported outcome measures and accuracy of screening tools
    Yilmazer, Cigdem
    D'haeseleer, Miguel
    Soler, Bernardita
    Van Wijmeersch, Bart
    Solaro, Claudio
    Ciampi, Ethel
    Carcamo, Claudia
    Van Asch, Paul
    Cambron, Melissa
    Lamers, Ilse
    Feys, Peter
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2025, : 474 - 488
  • [9] Test-retest reliability in an fMRI study of naming in dementia
    Paek, Eun Jin
    Murray, Laura L.
    Newman, Sharlene D.
    Kim, Dae-Jin
    BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2019, 191 : 31 - 45
  • [10] Evaluating test-retest reliability in patient-reported outcome measures for older people: A systematic review
    Park, Myung Sook
    Kang, Kyung Ja
    Jang, Sun Joo
    Lee, Joo Yun
    Chang, Sun Ju
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2018, 79 : 58 - 69