Phase I control chart for individual autocorrelated data: application to prescription opioid monitoring

被引:5
作者
Yao, Yuhui [1 ]
Chakraborti, Subha [2 ]
Yang, Xin [3 ]
Parton, Jason [2 ,3 ]
Lewis, Dwight [3 ,4 ]
Hudnall, Matthew [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Community Med & Populat Hlth, Tuscaloosa, AL USA
[2] Univ Alabama, Dept Informat Syst Stat & Management Sci, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
[3] Univ Alabama, Inst Data & Analyt, Tuscaloosa, AL USA
[4] Univ Alabama, Dept Management, Tuscaloosa, AL USA
关键词
model miss-specification; parameter estimation; phase I monitoring; retrospective control charts; robustness; serial correlation; statistical process monitoring; AVERAGE CONTROL CHARTS; SAMPLE-SIZE; RUN-LENGTH; (X)OVER-BAR; PERFORMANCE; DESIGN; PACKAGE; LIMITS;
D O I
10.1080/00224065.2022.2139783
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Phase I or retrospective process monitoring plays a key part in an overall statistical process monitoring (SPM) regime and is increasingly emphasized in the recent literature. At present, a lot of the data in a variety of settings (public and private sector organizations) are collected individually and sequentially and thus are serially correlated (or autocorrelated). Though a reasonable amount of work is available in the control charting literature for prospective (Phase II) autocorrelated data monitoring, very little work exists for the retrospective phase (Phase I). In this article, we present a Shewhart-type control chart for Phase I monitoring of individual autocorrelated data, assuming normality, with estimated parameters. The methodology, while developed and presented for the first-order autoregressive (AR(1)) model for simplicity, may be adapted to more general time series models. The correct charting constants, adjusted for autocorrelation and parameter estimation, are derived, and tabulated for a nominal in-control (IC) false alarm probability (FAP). Simulation results show that the proposed chart is favorably IC FAP robust and effective for reasonably small sample sizes, moderate autocorrelation, and some model miss-specifications, compared to other approaches. An illustration using some public health data involving prescription fentanyl transactions is provided to show the potential for broader areas of applications of the proposed methodology. Along with a summary and recommendations, some future research areas are indicated. An R package is developed and made available for implementing the proposed methodology on demand.
引用
收藏
页码:302 / 317
页数:16
相关论文
共 62 条
[11]   Recent Advances in Process Monitoring: Nonparametric and Variable-Selection Methods for Phase I and Phase II [J].
Capizzi, Giovanna .
QUALITY ENGINEERING, 2015, 27 (01) :44-67
[12]   Phase I Distribution-Free Analysis of Univariate Data [J].
Capizzi, Giovanna ;
Masarotto, Guido .
JOURNAL OF QUALITY TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 45 (03) :273-284
[13]  
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2018, OP OR MORPH MILL EQ
[14]   Nonparametric (distribution-free) control charts: An updated overview and some results [J].
Chakraborti, S. ;
Graham, M. A. .
QUALITY ENGINEERING, 2019, 31 (04) :523-544
[15]   Phase I Statistical Process Control Charts: An Overview and Some Results [J].
Chakraborti, S. ;
Human, S. W. ;
Graham, M. A. .
QUALITY ENGINEERING, 2009, 21 (01) :52-62
[16]  
Chakraborti S., 2007, NONPARAMETRIC CONTRO
[17]   Designing Phase I (X)over-bar charts with small sample sizes [J].
Champ, CW ;
Jones, LA .
QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 20 (05) :497-510
[18]   Evaluation of Phase I analysis scenarios on Phase II performance of control charts for autocorrelated observations [J].
Dasdemir, Erdi ;
Weiss, Christian ;
Testik, Murat Caner ;
Knoth, Sven .
QUALITY ENGINEERING, 2016, 28 (03) :293-304
[19]   SOME STATISTICAL PROCESS-CONTROL METHODS FOR AUTOCORRELATED DATA - DISCUSSION [J].
FALTIN, FW ;
WOODALL, WH .
JOURNAL OF QUALITY TECHNOLOGY, 1991, 23 (03) :194-197
[20]   Effect of autocorrelation estimators on the performance of the (X)over-bar control chart [J].
Garza-Venegas, J. A. ;
Tercero-Gomez, V. G. ;
Lee Ho, L. ;
Castagliola, P. ;
Celano, G. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL COMPUTATION AND SIMULATION, 2018, 88 (13) :2612-2630