Identifying the roles of technology: a systematic review of STEM education in primary and secondary schools from 2015 to 2023

被引:4
作者
Sun, Daner [1 ]
Zhan, Ying [2 ]
Wan, Zhi Hong [2 ]
Yang, Yuqin [3 ,4 ]
Looi, Chee-Kit [2 ]
机构
[1] Educ Univ Hong Kong, Dept Math & Informat Technol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Educ Univ Hong Kong, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Cent China Normal Univ, Fac Artificial Intelligence Educ, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[4] Cent China Normal Univ, Fac Artificial Intelligence Educ, Hubei Res Ctr Educ Informationizat, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
关键词
Empirical studies; primary and secondary levels; PRISMA; STEM education; technologies; AUGMENTED REALITY; STUDENTS; CONCEPTIONS; CURRICULUM; ENGAGEMENT; LITERACY; ROBOTICS; TALKING; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1080/02635143.2023.2251902
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
BackgroundWith the rapid advancement of technology, science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education has undergone significant transformations through the integration of various technologies. Studies are needed to provide a birds-eye view of the technology-oriented STEM education for identifying current status, development trends, and future directions.PurposeThis review aims to explore the characteristics of technology-oriented STEM education in primary and secondary schools, focusing on its status, regional contributions, subject domains, integration levels, outcomes, types of technologies, and research methods.MethodsTo conduct this review study, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses method was utilized, leading to the identification of 127 empirical studies from databases and selected journals.Results and conclusionThe results, based on a combination of research methods, revealed a notable increase in empirical studies on technology-oriented STEM education. Among the STEM subjects, more than half of the studies emphasized the integration of a single STEM subject, with interdisciplinary integration being dominant. Engineering was observed to be the least integrated subject among the four STEM areas. Learning objectives in the studies emphasized 21st-century skills and STEM skills, while affective research mainly focused on interests, attitudes, and engagement. Student-centered learning, such as inquiry-based learning and game-based learning, along with engineering design, emerged as the most commonly adopted pedagogical approaches. In the realm of technology tools, computational tools were found to be widely embraced in technology-oriented STEM education. Notably, the majority of studies targeted students in upper primary and junior secondary schools, employing mixed research methods. These findings hold significant implications for the design and implementation of technology-oriented STEM education at primary and secondary school levels.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 169
页数:25
相关论文
共 103 条
  • [1] Akgun OzcanErkan., 2013, STEM project-based learning. An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach, P65
  • [2] The use of augmented reality to foster conceptual knowledge acquisition in STEM laboratory courses-Theoretical background and empirical results
    Altmeyer, Kristin
    Kapp, Sebastian
    Thees, Michael
    Malone, Sarah
    Kuhn, Jochen
    Bruenken, Roland
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 51 (03) : 611 - 628
  • [3] American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 1993, Benchmarks for science literacy
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2007, Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology
  • [5] Breakdown of cortical effective connectivity during sleep
    Massimini, M
    Ferrarelli, F
    Huber, R
    Esser, SK
    Singh, H
    Tononi, G
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2005, 309 (5744) : 2228 - 2232
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2019, Framework for 21st Century Learning
  • [7] The effectiveness of an integrated STEM curriculum unit on middle school students' life science learning
    Anwar, Saira
    Menekse, Muhsin
    Guzey, Siddika Selcen
    Bryan, Lynn A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2022, 59 (07) : 1204 - 1234
  • [8] Authors, 2021, EARLY EDUC DEV
  • [9] Authors, 2023, THINK SKILLS CREAT
  • [10] Authors, 2020, INT J SCI MATH EDUC