Radical Complexity: Using Concepts From Complex Systems Theory to Think About Socialist Transformation

被引:0
作者
Powell, Christopher [1 ]
机构
[1] Toronto Metropolitan Univ, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
theory; socialism; complex systems; relational sociology; revolution;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Abolishing alienated labour requires the radical democratization of economic production. Complex systems theory offers tools for theorizing how this radical democracy could be constructed. In complex systems theory, the same structures and transformations appear across multiple domains in the physical and life sciences. Evolution is one such concept. Rather than being linear and gradual, evolution is a nonlinear process in which stable equilibria are punctuated by bursts of catastrophic change. Even catastrophic change, however, happens through an incremental process: the production of new forms through new combinations of existing forms. Each evolutionary permutation of a system is a step into its space of adjacent possibilities. The task of revolutionary theory can be conceptualized as that of plotting a course through capitalism's adjacent possibility space, bringing the system to a benign catastrophe that triggers a phase transition into socialism. The complexity of this mapping requires a distributed processing approach to theorizing that prefigures the distributed processing, or socialist general intellect, that must characterize any radically democratic worker control of production. This project suggests the expansion of a new role for professional intellectuals: that of tool makers, developing conceptual materials that feed a recursive process of the construction of socialist networks.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 38
页数:18
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Althusser Louis., 2005, For Marx, P87
[2]  
Althusser Louis, 1982, Philosophy of the Encounter: Later Writings, 1978-87
[3]  
Amin Samir., 1989, EUROCENTRISM
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V101, P569
[5]   Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter [J].
Barad, K .
SIGNS, 2003, 28 (03) :801-831
[6]   SOCIALIST PLURALISM AND PLURALIST SOCIALISM [J].
BARNARD, FM ;
VERNON, RA .
POLITICAL STUDIES, 1977, 25 (04) :474-490
[7]   CONCEPTUALIZING SOCIAL-STRUCTURE - THE MISUSE OF CLASSIFICATION IN STRUCTURAL MODELING [J].
BATES, FL ;
PEACOCK, WG .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1989, 54 (04) :565-577
[8]  
Bauman Zygmunt., 1987, Legislators and Interpreters: On Modernity, Post-Modernity, and Intellectuals
[9]  
Bernstein Eduard., 1961, EVOLUTIONARY SOCIALI
[10]  
Boas Franz., 1940, RACE LANGUAGE CULTUR