Ecosystems in construction management and urban development: a comprehensive review of conceptualizations and contributions

被引:3
作者
Vigren, Olli [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Sch Architecture & Built Environm, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Sch Architecture & Built Environm, Tekn Ringen 10B, S-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Literature review; business ecosystem; innovation ecosystem; platform ecosystem; INNOVATION ECOSYSTEMS; ENTREPRENEURIAL ECOSYSTEMS; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; BUSINESS ECOSYSTEM; DYNAMICS; KNOWLEDGE; THINKING; ECOLOGY; SUSTAINABILITY; OPPORTUNITIES;
D O I
10.1080/01446193.2023.2247496
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
To solve grand challenges, the collaboration between construction management and urban development professionals is essential. This article proposes that ecosystem conceptualizations can enhance our understanding of collaboration, but how these concepts contribute to this field is unclear. Therefore, a literature review is presented on how ecosystem concepts are operationalized in construction management and urban development research. The article classifies conceptualizations into seven categories and analyzes their potential for contributions to ecosystem theorizing. An ecosystem research agenda is developed, arguing that it can serve as a theoretical bridge between these disciplines. The article also highlights how research on ecosystems in the built environment sector can contribute to management and organization research fields more broadly. Notably, conceptualizations of ecosystems as project-based or location-based are valuable contributions to ecosystem research.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 181
页数:20
相关论文
共 119 条
  • [31] Dubois A., 2002, CONSTR MANAG ECON, V20, P621, DOI [10.1080/01446190210163543, DOI 10.1080/01446190210163543]
  • [32] Industrial ecology - Paradigm shift or normal science?
    Ehrenfeld, JR
    [J]. AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 2000, 44 (02) : 229 - 244
  • [33] Projects in the Business Ecosystem: The Case of Short Sea Shipping and Logistics
    Eriksson, Kent
    Wikstrom, Kim
    Hellstrom, Magnus
    Levitt, Raymond E.
    [J]. PROJECT MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2019, 50 (02) : 195 - 209
  • [34] Erkman S., 1997, J CLEAN PROD, V5, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0959-6526(97)00003-6, 10.1016/S0959-6526(97)00003-6]
  • [35] Innovation ecosystems: a meta-synthesis
    Ferasso, Marcos
    Wunsch Takahashi, Adriana R.
    Prado Gimenez, Fernando A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION SCIENCE, 2018, 10 (04) : 495 - 518
  • [36] Freeman C., 1987, TECHNOLOGY POLICY EC
  • [37] STRATEGIES FOR MANUFACTURING
    FROSCH, RA
    GALLOPOULOS, NE
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 1989, 261 (03) : 144 - 152
  • [38] Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation
    Gawer, Annabelle
    Cusumano, Michael A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2014, 31 (03) : 417 - 433
  • [39] Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology
    Gioia, Dennis A.
    Corley, Kevin G.
    Hamilton, Aimee L.
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2013, 16 (01) : 15 - 31
  • [40] Antecedents and Consequences of Digital Entrepreneurial Ecosystems in the Interaction Process with Smart City Development
    Gorelova, Irina
    Dmitrieva, Diana
    Dedova, Mariya
    Savastano, Marco
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2021, 11 (03)