Recall environment and post-recall stock market response

被引:1
作者
Javadinia, Amir [1 ]
Gill, Manpreet [2 ]
Jayachandran, Satish [2 ]
机构
[1] Florida Atlantic Univ, Coll Business, Dept Mkt, 777 Glades Rd, Boca Raton, FL 33431 USA
[2] Univ South Carolina, Darla Moore Sch Business, Dept Mkt, 1014 Greene St, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
关键词
Recall environment; Recall environment intensity; Product recalls; Event study; Stock returns; Coarsened exact matching; PRODUCT-HARM CRISIS; FIRM VALUE; MODERATING ROLE; SALIENCE; IMPACT; REPUTATION; MEDIA; INFORMATION; ATTENTION; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1007/s11747-023-00979-7
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
When a firm announces a product recall it typically incurs a market penalty in the form of a decline in its stock price. But a specific recall announcement often happens among recalls by other firms in the industry. Could recent recalls by other firms in the industry impact the market penalty for a new recall announcement? To capture and test this effect, the authors conceptualize recall environment intensity. Using salience theory, they identify the dimensions of the recall environment intensity construct, confirm these dimensions using interviews and a survey, and develop a measure for the construct. The authors then develop hypotheses for the effect of recall environment intensity on the stock penalty for a new recall announcement and propose boundary conditions for the effect. The hypotheses are tested using data from the automobile industry to show that a firm that announces a recall in a high intensity recall environment will have a smaller decline in stock price, though the effect varies with the reliability reputation of the brand and the age of the recalled products. The study provides a nuanced understanding of the stock market response to recall announcements and offers guidance on how to conceptualize and measure recall environment intensity.
引用
收藏
页码:1171 / 1194
页数:24
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2018, US Economic Contributions
  • [2] Marketing an IPO issuer in early stages of the IPO process
    Bahadir, S. Cem
    DeKinder, Jade S.
    Kohli, Ajay K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2015, 43 (01) : 14 - 31
  • [3] Product reliability and firm value: The experience of American and Japanese automakers, 1973-1992
    Barber, BM
    Darrough, MN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1996, 104 (05) : 1084 - 1099
  • [4] Corporate Sociopolitical Activism and Firm Value
    Bhagwat, Yashoda
    Warren, Nooshin L.
    Beck, Joshua T.
    Watson, George F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2020, 84 (05) : 1 - 21
  • [5] Bikker J., 2002, EC FINANCIAL MODELLI, V9, P53
  • [6] Halo (Spillover) Effects in Social Media: Do Product Recalls of One Brand Hurt or Help Rival Brands?
    Borah, Abhishek
    Tellis, Gerard J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2016, 53 (02) : 143 - 160
  • [7] Salience and Consumer Choice
    Bordalo, Pedro
    Gennaioli, Nicola
    Shleifer, Andrei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2013, 121 (05) : 803 - 843
  • [8] Salience and Asset Prices
    Bordalo, Pedro
    Gennaioli, Nicola
    Shleifer, Andrei
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (03) : 623 - 628
  • [9] Salience Theory of Choice Under Risk
    Bordalo, Pedro
    Gennaioli, Nicola
    Shleifer, Andrei
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2012, 127 (03) : 1243 - 1285
  • [10] When Do Chief Marketing Officers Affect Firm Value? A Customer Power Explanation
    Boyd, D. Eric
    Chandy, Rajesh K.
    Cunha, Marcus, Jr.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2010, 47 (06) : 1162 - 1176