Remaining cycle time prediction with Graph Neural Networks for Predictive Process Monitoring

被引:2
作者
Le Toan Duong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Trave-Massuyes, Louise [1 ,2 ]
Subias, Audine [1 ,2 ]
Merle, Christophe [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Toulouse, LAAS, INSA, CNRS, Toulouse, France
[2] Univ Fed Toulouse Midi Pyrenees, ANITI, Toulouse, France
[3] Vitesco Technol France SAS, Toulouse, France
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF 2023 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, ICMLT 2023 | 2023年
关键词
Predictive process monitoring; Remaining cycle time prediction; Machine learning; Graph neural networks;
D O I
10.1145/3589883.3589897
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Predictive process monitoring is at the intersection of machine learning and process mining. This subfield of process mining leverages historical data generated from process executions to make predictions about the ongoing process. One of the predictive process monitoring tasks with high interest is predicting the remaining cycle time of process instances. Recently, deep neural networks, particularly long short-term memory, have attracted much attention due to their ability to learn relevant features automatically and predict with high accuracy. While these models require data defined in the Euclidean space, graph neural networks have the advantage of handling data that can be represented as graphs. This paper proposes the use of graph neural network models to predict the remaining cycle time, which has not yet been studied in the literature. The proposed models are evaluated on real-life event logs and compared to a state-of-the-art long short-term memory model. The results show that graph neural network models can improve prediction accuracy, particularly for complex processes.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 101
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] A Vector-Based Classification Approach for Remaining Time Prediction in Business Processes
    Aburomman, Ahmad
    Lama, Manuel
    Bugarin, Alberto
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 128198 - 128212
  • [2] Bolt A., 2014, LNBIP, V171, P54, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-06257-0 5, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-06257-05]
  • [3] Learning Accurate LSTM Models of Business Processes
    Camargo, Manuel
    Dumas, Marlon
    Gonzalez-Rojas, Oscar
    [J]. BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT (BPM 2019), 2019, 11675 : 286 - 302
  • [4] Exploiting Instance Graphs and Graph Neural Networks for Next Activity Prediction
    Chiorrini, Andrea
    Diamantini, Claudia
    Mircoli, Alex
    Potena, Domenico
    [J]. PROCESS MINING WORKSHOPS, ICPM 2021, 2022, 433 : 115 - 126
  • [5] An extended model for remaining time prediction in manufacturing systems using process mining
    Choueiri, Alexandre Checoli
    Vecino Sato, Denise Maria
    Scalabrin, Edson Emilio
    Portela Santos, Eduardo Alves
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2020, 56 : 188 - 201
  • [6] Predictive Process Monitoring Methods: Which One Suits Me Best?
    Di Francescomarino, Chiara
    Ghidini, Chiara
    Maggi, Fabrizio Maria
    Milani, Fredrik
    [J]. BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT (BPM 2018), 2018, 11080 : 462 - 479
  • [7] Assessing product quality from the production process logs
    Duong, Le Toan
    Trave-Massuyes, Louise
    Subias, Audine
    Roa, Nathalie Barbosa
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 117 (5-6) : 1615 - 1631
  • [8] Predictive Monitoring of Business Processes: A Survey
    Eduardo Marquez-Chamorro, Alfonso
    Resinas, Manuel
    Ruiz-Cortes, Antonio
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SERVICES COMPUTING, 2018, 11 (06) : 962 - 977
  • [9] Big data driven jobs remaining time prediction in discrete manufacturing system: a deep learning-based approach
    Fang, Weiguang
    Guo, Yu
    Liao, Wenhe
    Ramani, Karthik
    Huang, Shaohua
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2020, 58 (09) : 2751 - 2766
  • [10] Folino F., 2012, MOVE MEANINGFUL INTE, P287, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-33606-5, 10.1007/978-3-642-33606-518, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-33606-518]