Cognitive biases in surgery: systematic review

被引:27
作者
Armstrong, Bonnie A. [1 ,2 ,8 ]
Dutescu, Ilinca A. [3 ]
Tung, Arthur [2 ]
Carter, Diana N. [4 ]
Trbovich, Patricia L. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Wong, Sherman [3 ]
Saposnik, Gustavo [6 ]
Grantcharov, Teodor [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] North York Gen Hosp, Humanera, Off Res & Innovat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] St Michaels Hosp, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Int Ctr Surg Safety, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Milton Dist Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Milton, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Inst Biomed Engn, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] St Michaels Hosp, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Clin Outcomes & Decis Neurosci Res Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Stanford Univ, Clin Excellence Res Ctr, Dept Surg, Stanford, CA USA
[8] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, 155 Coll St,Suite 425, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada
关键词
MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; RISK; HEURISTICS; JUDGMENT; PLAN; CARE;
D O I
10.1093/bjs/znad004
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Although numerous studies have established cognitive biases as contributors to surgical adverse events, their prevalence and impact in surgery are unknown. This review aimed to describe types of cognitive bias in surgery, their impact on surgical performance and patient outcomes, their source, and the mitigation strategies used to reduce their effect. Methods A literature search was conducted on 9 April and 6 December 2021 using MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Included studies investigated how cognitive biases affect surgery and the mitigation strategies used to combat their impact. The National Institutes of Health tools were used to assess study quality. Inductive thematic analysis was used to identify themes of cognitive bias impact on surgical performance. Results Thirty-nine studies were included, comprising 6514 surgeons and over 200 000 patients. Thirty-one types of cognitive bias were identified, with overconfidence, anchoring, and confirmation bias the most common. Cognitive biases differentially influenced six themes of surgical performance. For example, overconfidence bias associated with inaccurate perceptions of ability, whereas anchoring bias associated with inaccurate risk-benefit estimations and not considering alternative options. Anchoring and confirmation biases associated with actual patient harm, such as never events. No studies investigated cognitive bias source or mitigation strategies. Conclusion Cognitive biases have a negative impact on surgical performance and patient outcomes across all points of surgical care. This review highlights the scarcity of research investigating the sources that give rise to cognitive biases in surgery and the mitigation strategies that target these factors. Although numerous studies have established cognitive biases as contributors to surgical adverse events, their prevalence and impact in surgery are unknown. A systematic review was conducted on this topic and showed that all cognitive biases have a negative impact on surgical performance, with overconfidence, anchoring, and confirmation bias presenting the most harm to surgical performance and patient outcomes. No studies empirically investigated the source of cognitive bias in surgery or the mitigation strategies that could be used to combat their impact.
引用
收藏
页码:645 / 654
页数:10
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Designing meditation for doctor well-being: can 'Om' help obstetrics and gynaecology doctors? [J].
Allen, Rosie ;
Robinson, Andrew ;
Allen, Shelley ;
Nathan, Elizabeth ;
Coghlan, Edwina ;
Leung, Yee .
AUSTRALASIAN PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 28 (03) :342-347
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Diagnostic errors: technical series on safer primary care
[3]   Cognitive bias and severity of harm following surgery: Plan for workflow debiasing strategy [J].
Antonacci, Anthony C. ;
Dechario, Samuel P. ;
Rindskopf, David ;
Husk, Gregg ;
Jarrett, Mark .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 222 (06) :1172-1177
[4]   Cognitive Bias Impact on Management of Postoperative Complications, Medical Error, and Standard of Care [J].
Antonacci, Anthony C. ;
Dechario, Samuel P. ;
Antonacci, Caroline ;
Husk, Gregg ;
Patel, Vihas ;
Nicastro, Jeffrey ;
Coppa, Gene ;
Jarrett, Mark .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 258 :47-53
[5]  
Balogh E P., 2016, Improving Diagnosis in Health Care, DOI [DOI 10.17226/21794, 10.17226/21794]
[6]   Cognitive Biases and Heuristics in Medical Decision Making: A Critical Review Using a Systematic Search Strategy [J].
Blumenthal-Barby, J. S. ;
Krieger, Heather .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2015, 35 (04) :539-557
[7]   Barriers and facilitators to orthopaedic surgeons' uptake of decision aids for total knee arthroplasty: a qualitative study [J].
Bunzli, Samantha ;
Nelson, Elizabeth ;
Scott, Anthony ;
French, Simon ;
Choong, Peter ;
Dowsey, Michelle .
BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (11)
[8]   The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them [J].
Croskerry, P .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2003, 78 (08) :775-780
[9]   Sapere aude in the diagnostic process [J].
Croskerry, Pat .
DIAGNOSIS, 2020, 7 (03) :165-168
[10]   Cognitive debiasing 1: origins of bias and theory of debiasing [J].
Croskerry, Pat ;
Singhal, Geeta ;
Mamede, Silvia .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2013, 22 :ii58-ii64