Quickest Change Detection With Non-Stationary Post-Change Observations

被引:5
作者
Liang, Yuchen [1 ,2 ]
Tartakovsky, Alexander G. [3 ]
Veeravalli, Venugopal V. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Coordinated Sci Lab, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[3] AGT StatConsult, Los Angeles, CA 90274 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Delays; Uncertainty; Monitoring; Pandemics; Bayes methods; Random variables; Numerical models; Quickest change detection; non-stationary observations; CuSum procedure; generalized likelihood-ratio CuSum procedure; pandemic monitoring; ASYMPTOTIC OPTIMALITY; TIMES;
D O I
10.1109/TIT.2022.3230583
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The problem of quickest detection of a change in the distribution of a sequence of independent observations is considered. The pre-change observations are assumed to be stationary with a known distribution, while the post-change observations are allowed to be non-stationary with some possible parametric uncertainty in their distributions. In particular, it is assumed that the cumulative Kullback-Leibler divergence between the post-change and the pre-change distributions grows in a certain manner with time after the change-point. For the case where the post-change distributions are known, a universal asymptotic lower bound on the delay is derived, as the false alarm rate goes to zero. Furthermore, a window-limited Cumulative Sum (CuSum) procedure is developed, and shown to achieve the lower bound asymptotically. For the case where the post-change distributions have parametric uncertainty, a window-limited (WL) generalized likelihood-ratio (GLR) CuSum procedure is developed and is shown to achieve the universal lower bound asymptotically. Extensions to the case with dependent observations are discussed. The analysis is validated through numerical results on synthetic data. The use of the WL-GLR-CuSum procedure in monitoring pandemics is also demonstrated.
引用
收藏
页码:3400 / 3414
页数:15
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2008, Sequential Analysis
  • [2] [Anonymous], NEW YORK TIMES
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2008, SEQUENTIAL ANAL, DOI DOI 10.1080/07474940802446046
  • [4] Baron M., 2006, Sequential Anal., V25, P257
  • [5] Information bounds and quick detection of parameter changes in stochastic systems
    Lai, TL
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 1998, 44 (07) : 2917 - 2929
  • [6] Sequential (Quickest) Change Detection: Classical Results and New Directions
    Xie L.
    Zou S.
    Xie Y.
    Veeravalli V.V.
    [J]. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Information Theory, 2021, 2 (02): : 494 - 514
  • [7] PROCEDURES FOR REACTING TO A CHANGE IN DISTRIBUTION
    LORDEN, G
    [J]. ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1971, 42 (06): : 1897 - &
  • [8] Numerical Comparison of CUSUM and Shiryaev-Roberts Procedures for Detecting Changes in Distributions
    Moustakides, George V.
    Polunchenko, Aleksey S.
    Tartakovsky, Alexander G.
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 2009, 38 (16-17) : 3225 - 3239
  • [9] OPTIMAL STOPPING-TIMES FOR DETECTING CHANGES IN DISTRIBUTIONS
    MOUSTAKIDES, GV
    [J]. ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1986, 14 (04) : 1379 - 1387
  • [10] CONTINUOUS INSPECTION SCHEMES
    PAGE, ES
    [J]. BIOMETRIKA, 1954, 41 (1-2) : 100 - &