Creating capabilities to be better

被引:0
作者
Guma, Francesca [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
来源
PHILOSOPHICAL INQUIRIES | 2023年 / 11卷 / 02期
关键词
moral enhancement; procedural moral enhancement; agency; free will; boost;
D O I
10.4454/philinq.v11i2.493
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
In this paper, I argue that the possibility of becoming better moral agents is related to the possibility of increasing both the opportunity and capacity to will otherwise and the effective conscious control of the will. Believing that it is essential for empirically informed ethics interested in moral enhancement to assess what to enhance and what type of enhancer is preferable, I begin by considering different types of enhancers and different factors on which they perform their action ( 1). Secondly, I consider some issues arisen by moral enhancement in relation to the agent's freedom, emphasizing the need to reflect on the effects that such interventions can have on the agency ( 2). I then propose a conception of free-will which can dialogue with empirical research in order to assess what the best moral enhancers might be and what factors they should act on to achieve real moral enhancements in individuals ( 3). On such a basis, I assess what and how to enhance to achieve real moral improvement ( 4) and present empirical proposals for procedural moral enhancement that leave open the possibility of achieving real individual moral improvement ( 5). Finally, I conclude by stating that seeking out enhancers that can implement the opportunity and capacity to be good can lead to outcomes in which individuals do not become incapable of doing evil, but rather more capable of doing good ( 6).
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 89
页数:17
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Batistela Silmara, 2016, Dement. neuropsychol., V10, P134
  • [2] Bermudez Jose Luis, 2018, Self-Control, Decision Theory, and Rationality: New Essays
  • [3] Enhancing Moral Conformity and Enhancing Moral Worth
    Douglas, Thomas
    [J]. NEUROETHICS, 2014, 7 (01) : 75 - 91
  • [4] Elster J, 2016, SOUR GRAPES: STUDIES IN THE SUBVERSION OF RATIONALITY, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781316494172
  • [5] Gigerenzer G., 2008, Rationality of Mortals: How People Cope with Uncertainty
  • [6] The Artificial Moral Advisor. The “Ideal Observer” Meets Artificial Intelligence
    Giubilini A.
    Savulescu J.
    [J]. Philosophy & Technology, 2018, 31 (2) : 169 - 188
  • [7] Nudge Versus Boost: How Coherent are Policy and Theory?
    Grune-Yanoff, Till
    Hertwig, Ralph
    [J]. MINDS AND MACHINES, 2016, 26 (1-2) : 149 - 183
  • [8] Becoming Better Moral Agents by Strengthening Free Will. A Possible Prospect?
    Guma, Francesca
    [J]. TEORIA-RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA, 2022, 42 (02): : 187 - 199
  • [9] Harari Y. N., 2016, Financial Times August 26
  • [10] Harris J., 2016, How to be Good