Beyond online disinformation: assessing national information resilience in four European countries

被引:15
作者
Dragomir, Marius [1 ]
Ruas-Araujo, Jose [2 ]
Horowitz, Minna [3 ]
机构
[1] Cent European Univ CEU, Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Vigo, Vigo, Spain
[3] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
来源
HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS | 2024年 / 11卷 / 01期
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
POLITICAL NEWS; FACT-CHECKING; FAKE NEWS; MEDIA; STRATEGIES; MANCINI; HALLIN;
D O I
10.1057/s41599-024-02605-5
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
As social media is a key conduit for the distribution of disinformation, much of the literature on disinformation in elections has been focused on the internet and global social media platforms. Literature on societal and media trust has also grown in recent years. Yet, disinformation is not limited to global platforms or the internet, traditional media outlets in many European countries act as vehicles of disinformation often under the direction of the government. Moreover, the connection between trust and resilience to disinformation has been less discussed. This article is aimed at tackling the question of what makes a country vulnerable to or resilient against online disinformation. It argues that a society's information resilience can be viewed as a combination of structural characteristics, features of its knowledge-distribution institutions including its media system, and the activities and capabilities of its citizens. The article makes this argument by describing these dimensions in four European case countries, based on comparable statistics and document analyses. The results indicate that European-wide strategies do not uniformly strengthen national resilience against disinformation and that anti-disinformation strategies need to be anchored in targeted assessments of the state of information resilience at the national level to be more effective. Such assessments are central, particularly to understanding citizens' information needs in key democratic events such as elections.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
Allcott H., 2018, J Econ Perspect, V32, P31
[2]   Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election [J].
Allcott, Hunt ;
Gentzkow, Matthew .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2017, 31 (02) :211-235
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Action Plan Against Disinformation
[4]  
Balytien A., 2023, How to assess national resilience to online disinformation? Comparing Finland and Lithuania [Policy brief]
[5]  
Bayer J, 2021, Disinformation and propaganda: impact on the functioning of the rule of law and democratic processes in the eu and its member states: 2021 update
[6]   Complicating the Resilience Model: A Four-Country Study About Misinformation [J].
Boulianne, Shelley ;
Tenove, Chris ;
Buffie, Jordan .
MEDIA AND COMMUNICATION, 2022, 10 (03) :169-182
[7]   Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election [J].
Bovet, Alexandre ;
Makse, Hernan A. .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 10 (1)
[8]   Hallin and Mancini Revisited: Four Empirical Types of Western Media Systems [J].
Brueggemann, Michael ;
Engesser, Sven ;
Buechel, Florin ;
Humprecht, Edda ;
Castro, Laia .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2014, 64 (06) :1037-1065
[9]   Populism, cyberdemocracy and disinformation: analysis of the social media strategies of the French extreme right in the 2014 and 2019 European elections [J].
Carral, Uxia ;
Tunon, Jorge ;
Elias, Carlos .
HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 10 (01)
[10]  
Charvat J, 2023, Radicalization of Czech society: a new phenomenon, or the result of long-term developments?