Communicating scientific uncertainty in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: A message experiment

被引:3
作者
Adams, Dallin R. [1 ,4 ]
Ratcliff, Chelsea L. [2 ]
Pokharel, Manusheela [3 ]
Jensen, Jakob D. [1 ]
Liao, Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Commun, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Dept Commun Studies, Athens, GA USA
[3] Texas State Univ, Dept Commun Studies, San Marcos, TX USA
[4] Univ Utah, Dept Commun, 255 Cent Campus Dr, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
关键词
behavioral intentions; message credibility; COVID-19; pandemic; uncertainty; CANCER-RESEARCH; NEWS COVERAGE; HEALTH-CARE; SCIENCE; CREDIBILITY; MEDIA; LITERACY; IMPACT; HYPE;
D O I
10.1111/risa.14256
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The World Health Organization (WHO) officially declared COVID-19 a pandemic on March 11, 2020. It was a time of significant uncertainty as experts were not yet certain whether social distancing behaviors were necessary to slow the spread of the virus. Some public communicators opted to acknowledge uncertainty based on the limited evidence, whereas others downplayed uncertainty. This situation provided researchers with an opportunity to advance theory by explicating and testing cognitive responses to message uncertainty. Immediately following the WHO declaration (March 13-19, 2020), U.S. adults (N = 1186) were randomly assigned to one of six conditions in a 2 (message uncertainty: low, high) x 3 (argument support: expert, threat, precedent) between-participants experiment. Overall, perceived uncertainty negatively mediated the impact of message uncertainty on intentions. However, participant education was a key moderator. For those with more than a high school education, uncertain messages were related to higher intentions to social distance through increased critical reflection. For those with a high school education or less, uncertain messages were related to lower intentions through decreased message credibility.
引用
收藏
页码:1700 / 1715
页数:16
相关论文
共 76 条
[51]  
O'Keefe DJ, 2003, COMMUN THEOR, V13, P251, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00292.x
[52]   Communicating Uncertainties during the COVID-19 Outbreak [J].
Paek, Hye-Jin ;
Hove, Thomas .
HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2020, 35 (14) :1729-1731
[53]   The Value of Explaining the Process: How Journalistic Transparency and Perceptions of News Media Importance Can (Sometimes) Foster Message Credibility and Engagement Intentions [J].
Peifer, Jason T. ;
Meisinger, Jared .
JOURNALISM & MASS COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2021, 98 (03) :828-853
[54]   Communicating the uncertainty of harms and benefits of medical interventions [J].
Politi, Mary C. ;
Han, Paul K. J. ;
Col, Nananda F. .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2007, 27 (05) :681-695
[55]  
Popper, 1959, LOGIC SCI DISCOVERY
[56]   How the public evaluates media representations of uncertain science: An integrated explanatory framework [J].
Ratcliff, Chelsea L. ;
Wicke, Rebekah .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2023, 32 (04) :410-427
[57]   Communicating uncertainty to the public during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review of the literature [J].
Ratcliff, Chelsea L. ;
Wicke, Rebekah ;
Harvill, Blue .
ANNALS OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION, 2022, 46 (04) :260-289
[58]   Communicating Scientific Uncertainty Across the Dissemination Trajectory: A Precision Medicine Case Study [J].
Ratcliff, Chelsea L. .
SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2021, 43 (05) :597-623
[59]  
Ratcliff CL, 2018, ELECTR MEDIA RES SER, P156
[60]   Correlations Among Variables in Message and Messenger Credibility Scales [J].
Roberts, Chris .
AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 2010, 54 (01) :43-56