Communicating scientific uncertainty in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: A message experiment

被引:3
作者
Adams, Dallin R. [1 ,4 ]
Ratcliff, Chelsea L. [2 ]
Pokharel, Manusheela [3 ]
Jensen, Jakob D. [1 ]
Liao, Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Commun, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Dept Commun Studies, Athens, GA USA
[3] Texas State Univ, Dept Commun Studies, San Marcos, TX USA
[4] Univ Utah, Dept Commun, 255 Cent Campus Dr, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
关键词
behavioral intentions; message credibility; COVID-19; pandemic; uncertainty; CANCER-RESEARCH; NEWS COVERAGE; HEALTH-CARE; SCIENCE; CREDIBILITY; MEDIA; LITERACY; IMPACT; HYPE;
D O I
10.1111/risa.14256
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The World Health Organization (WHO) officially declared COVID-19 a pandemic on March 11, 2020. It was a time of significant uncertainty as experts were not yet certain whether social distancing behaviors were necessary to slow the spread of the virus. Some public communicators opted to acknowledge uncertainty based on the limited evidence, whereas others downplayed uncertainty. This situation provided researchers with an opportunity to advance theory by explicating and testing cognitive responses to message uncertainty. Immediately following the WHO declaration (March 13-19, 2020), U.S. adults (N = 1186) were randomly assigned to one of six conditions in a 2 (message uncertainty: low, high) x 3 (argument support: expert, threat, precedent) between-participants experiment. Overall, perceived uncertainty negatively mediated the impact of message uncertainty on intentions. However, participant education was a key moderator. For those with more than a high school education, uncertain messages were related to higher intentions to social distance through increased critical reflection. For those with a high school education or less, uncertain messages were related to lower intentions through decreased message credibility.
引用
收藏
页码:1700 / 1715
页数:16
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   Toward a theory of motivated information management [J].
Afifi, WA ;
Weiner, JL .
COMMUNICATION THEORY, 2004, 14 (02) :167-190
[2]   Measuring Message Credibility: Construction and Validation of an Exclusive Scale [J].
Appelman, Alyssa ;
Sundar, S. Shyam .
JOURNALISM & MASS COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2016, 93 (01) :59-79
[3]   Nanoinfluencer marketing: How message features affect credibility and behavioral intentions [J].
Balaji, M. S. ;
Yangyang Jiang ;
Jha, Subhash .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 136 :293-304
[4]   Trusting Others: A Pareto Distribution of Source and Message Credibility Among News Reporters [J].
Barnoy, Aviv ;
Reich, Zvi .
COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2022, 49 (02) :196-220
[5]  
Berger CR, 1974, Hum Commun Res, V1, P99, DOI [10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00258.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1468-2958.1975.TB00258.X]
[6]  
Bradac JJ, 2001, J COMMUN, V51, P456, DOI 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02891.x
[7]  
Brashers DE, 2001, J COMMUN, V51, P477, DOI 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02892.x
[8]  
Brookfield S, 2016, RESEARCHING CRITICAL REFLECTION: MULTIDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVES, P11
[9]   SPINNING THE GENOME why science hype matters [J].
Caulfield, Timothy .
PERSPECTIVES IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2018, 61 (04) :560-571
[10]   The effect of falsely balanced reporting of the autism-vaccine controversy on vaccine safety perceptions and behavioral intentions [J].
Dixon, Graham ;
Clarke, Christopher .
HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2013, 28 (02) :352-359