Multi-focus image fusion algorithm based on SML and difference image

被引:1
作者
Liao, Li-na [1 ]
Li, Wei-tong [1 ]
Xiang, Ying [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Univ Technol, Sch Informat Engn, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
关键词
multi-focus image fusion; sum-modified-Laplacian; difference image; focus region detection; GUIDED FILTER;
D O I
10.37188/CJLCD.2022-0236
中图分类号
O7 [晶体学];
学科分类号
0702 ; 070205 ; 0703 ; 080501 ;
摘要
Aiming at the problems of edge blurring and artifacts in traditional multi-focus image fusion algorithm, a multi-focus image fusion algorithm based on sum-modified-Laplacian (SML) and difference image is proposed. Firstly, in order to extract the focus feature information of source images, the focus measurement is performed by SML and difference operation between filtered images and source images respectively, and the guided filtering is adopted to obtain more detailed features. Then, the initial fusion decision map is generated by using pixel-wise maximum rule, the small area removal strategy is performed to eliminate the noise caused by the similarity of focus and defocus areas, and inconsistency processing is used to generated final decision map to obtain a more accurate focus region. Finally, the fused image is obtained by the pixel-by-pixel weighted average rule. Experimental results indicate that the proposed algorithm is superior to the comparison algorithm in both subjective visual effect and objective evaluation metrics. The mutual information, feature mutual information and image gradient features are improved by 0. 17%, 0. 38% and 0. 11% respectively on color images. On grayscale images, the improvements are 0. 7%, 0. 86% and 0. 47%, respectively. Furthermore, the average consuming time is less than 0. 5 s with high computational efficiency. In addition, the algorithm can better retain the integrity of source image information, and the fusion image has clear edges without artifacts.
引用
收藏
页码:524 / 533
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Multi-focus image fusion techniques: a survey [J].
Bhat, Shiveta ;
Koundal, Deepika .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2021, 54 (08) :5735-5787
[2]  
Chen Y, 2021, J INTERF CYTOK RES, V41, P220, DOI [10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2020081456, 10.1089/jir.2021.0023]
[3]  
Chen Zhen, 2015, Chinese Journal of Liquid Crystals and Displays, V30, P1024, DOI [10.3788/yjyxs20153006.1024, 10.3788/YJYXS20153006.1024]
[4]   Guided Image Filtering [J].
He, Kaiming ;
Sun, Jian ;
Tang, Xiaoou .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2013, 35 (06) :1397-1409
[5]   Evaluation of focus measures in multi-focus image fusion [J].
Huang, Wei ;
Jing, Zhongliang .
PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 2007, 28 (04) :493-500
[6]   Pixel-level image fusion: A survey of the state of the art [J].
Li, Shutao ;
Kang, Xudong ;
Fang, Leyuan ;
Hu, Jianwen ;
Yin, Haitao .
INFORMATION FUSION, 2017, 33 :100-112
[7]   Image Fusion with Guided Filtering [J].
Li, Shutao ;
Kang, Xudong ;
Hu, Jianwen .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2013, 22 (07) :2864-2875
[8]   Image matting for fusion of multi-focus images in dynamic scenes [J].
Li, Shutao ;
Kang, Xudong ;
Hu, Jianwen ;
Yang, Bin .
INFORMATION FUSION, 2013, 14 (02) :147-162
[9]   Multifocus image fusion using artificial neural networks [J].
Li, ST ;
Kwok, JT ;
Wang, YN .
PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 2002, 23 (08) :985-997
[10]   Multi-focus image fusion based on nonsubsampled contourlet transform and residual removal [J].
Li, Xiaosong ;
Zhou, Fuqiang ;
Tan, Haishu ;
Chen, Yuanze ;
Zuo, Wangxia .
SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2021, 184