Comparing Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms for Ambulance Allocation: An Experimental Simulation Study

被引:3
|
作者
Schjolberg, Magnus Eide [1 ]
Bekkevold, Nicklas I. Paus [1 ]
Sanchez-Diaz, Xavier F. C. [1 ]
Mengshoel, Ole Jakob [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Trondheim, Norway
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2023 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, GECCO 2023 | 2023年
关键词
vehicle fleet management; ambulance allocation; emergency medical service; response time; simulation; optimization; genetic algorithms; stochastic local search; memetic algorithms; STOCHASTIC LOCAL SEARCH; LOCATION; MODEL; TRANSPORTATION; DEPLOYMENT; DEMAND;
D O I
10.1145/3583131.3590345
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The optimization of Emergency Medical Services is a central issue in modern healthcare systems. With this in focus, we study a data set containing medical emergencies for the years 2015-2019 from Oslo and Akershus, Norway. By developing a discrete trace-based simulation model based on the data set, we compute average response times that are used to optimize ambulance allocations to stations in the region. We study several metaheuristics, specifically genetic, stochastic local search, and memetic algorithms. These metaheuristics are tested using the simulation to optimize ambulance allocations, considering response times. The algorithms are compared against each other and a set of baseline allocation models over different time periods. The main results of our experimental simulation study are that: (i) the metaheuristics generally outperform the simpler baselines, (ii) the best-performing metaheuristic is the genetic algorithm, and (iii) the performance difference between the metaheuristics and the simpler baselines increases in situations with high demand on ambulances. Finally, we present suggestions for future work that may help to further improve upon the current state-of-the-art.
引用
收藏
页码:1454 / 1463
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A probabilistic metric for comparing metaheuristic optimization algorithms
    Gomes, Wellison J. S.
    Beck, Andre T.
    Lopez, Rafael H.
    Miguel, Leandro F. F.
    STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2018, 70 : 59 - 70
  • [2] Measuring the effectiveness and efficiency of simulation optimization metaheuristic algorithms
    Thengvall, Benjamin G.
    Hall, Shane N.
    Deskevich, Michael P.
    JOURNAL OF HEURISTICS, 2025, 31 (01)
  • [3] Fault-tolerant thrust allocation analysis using metaheuristic optimization algorithms
    Li, Xuebin
    Yang, Luchun
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2024, 299
  • [4] Impact of chaotic dynamics on the performance of metaheuristic optimization algorithms: An experimental analysis
    Zelinka, Ivan
    Diep, Quoc Bao
    Snasel, Vaclav
    Das, Swagatam
    Innocenti, Giacomo
    Tesi, Alberto
    Schoen, Fabio
    Kuznetsov, Nikolay V.
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2022, 587 : 692 - 719
  • [5] Metaheuristic algorithms for the simultaneous slot allocation problem
    Pellegrini, P.
    Castelli, L.
    Pesenti, R.
    IET INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS, 2012, 6 (04) : 453 - 462
  • [6] Operational zones for comparing metaheuristic and deterministic one-dimensional global optimization algorithms
    Sergeyev, Yaroslav D.
    Kvasov, Dmitri E.
    Mukhametzhanov, Marat S.
    MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION, 2017, 141 : 96 - 109
  • [7] Metaheuristic algorithms for combinatorial optimization problems
    Iori M.
    4OR, 2005, 3 (2) : 163 - 166
  • [8] Implementing metaheuristic optimization algorithms with JECoLi
    Evangelista, Pedro
    Maia, Paulo
    Rocha, Miguel
    2009 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS DESIGN AND APPLICATIONS, 2009, : 505 - 510
  • [9] The Mosaic of Metaheuristic Algorithms in Structural Optimization
    Lagaros, Nikos D.
    Plevris, Vagelis
    Kallioras, Nikos Ath
    ARCHIVES OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 29 (07) : 5457 - 5492
  • [10] The Mosaic of Metaheuristic Algorithms in Structural Optimization
    Nikos D. Lagaros
    Vagelis Plevris
    Nikos Ath. Kallioras
    Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2022, 29 : 5457 - 5492