Exploring the use of digital technology to deliver healthcare services with explicit consideration of health inequalities in UK settings: A scoping review

被引:2
作者
Farre, Albert [1 ]
Fang, Mei [1 ]
Hannah, Beth [2 ]
Makita, Meiko [1 ]
McFadden, Alison [1 ]
Menezes, Deborah [3 ]
Rodriguez, Andrea [4 ]
Sixsmith, Judith [1 ]
Gray, Nicola M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dundee, Sch Hlth Sci, 11 Airlie Pl, Dundee DD1 4HJ, Scotland
[2] Univ Dundee, Sch Humanities Social Sci & Law, Dundee, Scotland
[3] Heriot Watt Univ, Urban Inst, Edinburgh, Scotland
[4] Univ Dundee, Sch Dent, Dundee, Scotland
来源
DIGITAL HEALTH | 2023年 / 9卷
关键词
Scoping review; digital technology; delivery of health care; health inequities; disadvantaged populations; United Kingdom; TIME;
D O I
10.1177/20552076231185442
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectiveTo map and explore existing evidence on the use of digital technology to deliver healthcare services with explicit consideration of health inequalities in UK settings. MethodsWe searched six bibliographic databases, and the National Health Service (NHS) websites of each UK nation (England, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland). Restrictions were applied on publication date (2013-2021) and publication language (English). Records were independently screened against eligibility criteria by pairs of reviewers from the team. Articles reporting relevant qualitative and/or quantitative research were included. Data were synthesised narratively. ResultsEleven articles, reporting data from nine interventions, were included. Articles reported findings from quantitative (n = 5), qualitative (n = 5), and mixed-methods (n = 1) studies. Study settings were mainly community based, with only one hospital based. Two interventions targeted service users, and seven interventions targeted healthcare providers. Two studies were explicitly and directly aimed at (and designed for) addressing health inequalities, with the remaining studies addressing them indirectly (e.g. study population can be classed as disadvantaged). Seven articles reported data on implementation outcomes (acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility) and four articles reported data on effectiveness outcomes, with only one intervention demonstrating cost-effectiveness. ConclusionsIt is not yet clear if digital health interventions/services in the UK work for those most at risk of health inequalities. The current evidence base is significantly underdeveloped, and research/intervention efforts have been largely driven by healthcare provider/system needs, rather than those of service users. Digital health interventions can help address health inequalities, but a range of barriers persist, alongside a potential for exacerbation of health inequalities.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Telephone Consultation as a Substitute for Routine Out-patient Face-to-face Consultation for Children With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Randomised Controlled Trial and Economic Evaluation
    Akobeng, Anthony K.
    O'Leary, Neil
    Vail, Andy
    Brown, Nailah
    Widiatmoko, Dono
    Fagbemi, Andrew
    Thomas, Adrian G.
    [J]. EBIOMEDICINE, 2015, 2 (09): : 1251 - 1256
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2018, COCREATION COPRODUCT
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, Equality Act
  • [4] COVID-19 and digital inequalities: Reciprocal impacts and mitigation strategies
    Beaunoyer, Elisabeth
    Dupere, Sophie
    Guitton, Matthieu J.
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2020, 111
  • [5] Implementation science should give higher priority to health equity
    Brownson, Ross C.
    Kumanyika, Shiriki K.
    Kreuter, Matthew W.
    Haire-Joshu, Debra
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [6] COVID-19 infodemic and digital health literacy in vulnerable populations: A scoping review
    Choukou, Mohamed-Amine
    Sanchez-Ramirez, Diana C.
    Pol, Margriet
    Uddin, Mohy
    Monnin, Caroline
    Syed-Abdul, Shabbir
    [J]. DIGITAL HEALTH, 2022, 8
  • [7] Crombie I., 2018, Public Health Research, V6, DOI [DOI 10.3310/PHR06060, 10.3310/phr06060]
  • [8] Combating Digital Health Inequality in the Time of Coronavirus
    Gann, Bob
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER HEALTH ON THE INTERNET, 2020, 24 (03) : 278 - 284
  • [9] Remote by default general practice: must we, should we, dare we?
    Greenhalgh, Trisha
    Rosen, Rebecca
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2021, 71 (705) : 149 - 150
  • [10] Hancock M., SPEECH