Living in sprawling areas: a cost-benefit analysis in Poland

被引:3
|
作者
Litynski, Piotr [1 ]
机构
[1] Cracow Univ Econ, Dept Spatial Dev, Rakowicka 27, PL-31510 Krakow, Poland
关键词
Cost-benefit analysis; Cost of living; Suburbia; Residents; Spatial policy; Poland; URBAN SPRAWL; LIFE-CYCLE; TRANSPORT; TRAVEL; SATISFACTION; TIME;
D O I
10.1007/s10901-022-09986-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Suburbanization still remains the key urbanization process in the world. Urban sprawl, as a specific manifestation of suburban morphology, belongs to the urban phenomena that is very often studied but still remains ambivalent. The ambivalence of the assessment results from the problems of weighing costs and benefits generated by sprawl. At the same time, there is a gap in international research on the costs and benefits of urban sprawl for households. Therefore, the aim of this article is to analyze and evaluate the household budgets in Poland in terms of potential costs and benefits of living in an urban sprawl area. The research hypothesis that households causing urban sprawl achieve net budgetary benefits was also adopted. In order to achieve the aim and verify the hypothesis, the data on the budgets of Polish households purchased from the Polish Central Statistical Office was used, and a questionnaire survey was carried out to determine the conclusions. The research hypothesis was not confirmed. The analysis and evaluation of many income and expenditure items of household budgets indicate that net costs in a significant group of budget items is high, while net benefits are relatively low. Households relocating to the sprawl zone, striving to meet their own needs, do not fully take into account all operating expenditures and ultimately incur net costs.
引用
收藏
页码:1069 / 1096
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Unreliable trains and induced rescheduling: implications for cost-benefit analysis
    Tseng, Yin-Yen
    Rietveld, Piet
    Verhoef, Erik T.
    TRANSPORTATION, 2012, 39 (02) : 387 - 407
  • [32] Barriers to promoting prefabricated construction in China: A cost-benefit analysis
    Hong, Jingke
    Shen, Geoffrey Qiping
    Li, Zhengdao
    Zhang, Boyu
    Zhang, Wanqiu
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 172 : 649 - 660
  • [33] Distributed accountability: picking a carbon price for cost-benefit analysis
    Tvedten, Irene Ovstebo
    JOURNAL OF CULTURAL ECONOMY, 2022, 15 (03) : 358 - 372
  • [34] Lost in Taxation The 2019 Cost-Benefit Analysis Debate in Italy
    Massiani, Jerome
    ITALIAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2024, 10 (01) : 81 - 124
  • [35] Winter problems on mountain passes - Implications for cost-benefit analysis
    Bardal, Kjersti Granas
    Mathisen, Terje Andreas
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2015, 74 : 59 - 72
  • [36] Cost-benefit analysis of alternative vehicles in the Philippines using immediate and distant future scenarios
    Lopez, Neil Stephen
    Soliman, Jimwell
    Biona, Jose Bienvenido Manuel
    Fulton, Lewis
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 82
  • [37] Cost-Benefit Analysis in Public Project Appraisal
    Brzozowska, Krystyna
    INZINERINE EKONOMIKA-ENGINEERING ECONOMICS, 2007, (03): : 78 - 83
  • [38] Is cost-benefit analysis anomaly-proof?
    Hanley, N
    Shogren, JF
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2005, 32 (01) : 13 - 34
  • [39] Technological Literacy for Democracy: a Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Carabantes M.
    Philosophy & Technology, 2021, 34 (4) : 701 - 715
  • [40] Cost-benefit analysis of software quality models
    Khoshgoftaar, TM
    Allen, EB
    Jones, WD
    Hudepohl, JP
    SOFTWARE QUALITY JOURNAL, 2001, 9 (01) : 9 - 30