A review of social roles in green consumer behaviour

被引:18
作者
Xiao, Jing [1 ]
Yang, Zhi [1 ]
Li, Zhen [2 ]
Chen, Zhi [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Management, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[2] Kansai Univ, Fac Business & Commerce, Osaka, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
bibliometric analysis; content analysis; green consumer behaviour; social roles; text mining; traditional versus digital contexts; PRO-ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOR; WORD-OF-MOUTH; SUSTAINABLE FOOD-CONSUMPTION; COMMITMENT-TRUST THEORY; PURCHASE INTENTION; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; CHINESE CONSUMERS; DECISION-MAKING; ENERGY-EFFICIENCY; PRODUCT PURCHASE;
D O I
10.1111/ijcs.12865
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Despite the broad interest and rapid increase in studying green consumer behaviour (GCB) from a social perspective, related articles have been presented in a piecemeal fashion and have lacked a review of social roles in GCB. Additionally, the research focus may differ from the influence of digital technology. Therefore, this study draws on a review of 439 GCB articles that focus on social roles and utilizes both quantitative and qualitative analyses to provide a general picture of theories, social factors, research topics and topic trends with a specific emphasis on the research differences between the traditional and digital contexts. The findings indicate that the GCB field has experienced exponential growth since 2014. Subjective norms, social influence, culture, marketing influence and social media influence are the main drivers of GCB. Eight research topics are identified, among which topics on the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) and the theory of consumption values (TCV) maintained high popularity. Furthermore, the TPB is more prevalent in the traditional context in which scholars prefer to predict GCB using macrosocial factors, such as policy and culture. In comparison, signal theory and commitment-trust theory have received more attention in the digital context in which trust is vital. Research interests in online platforms and green hotels have recently increased in the digital context. Gaps and suggested directions for future studies are further identified.
引用
收藏
页码:2033 / 2070
页数:38
相关论文
共 249 条
  • [11] Understanding the Antecedents of Organic Food Consumption in Pakistan: Moderating Role of Food Neophobia
    Akbar, Ahsan
    Ali, Saqib
    Ahmad, Muhammad Azeem
    Akbar, Minhas
    Danish, Muhammad
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (20)
  • [13] People purchase intention towards hydrogen fuel cell vehicles: An experiential enquiry in Malaysia
    Al-Amin, Abul Quasem
    Ambrose, Angelina F.
    Masud, Muhammad Mehedi
    Azam, Mohammad Nurul
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2016, 41 (04) : 2117 - 2127
  • [14] Almeida A.F.D., 2012, COMPORTAMENTO CONSUM
  • [15] [Anonymous], 2007, INT J CONSUM STUD, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2013.10.083
  • [16] What motivates the adoption of green restaurant products and services? A systematic review and future research agenda
    Arun, T. M.
    Kaur, Puneet
    Ferraris, Alberto
    Dhir, Amandeep
    [J]. BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 30 (04) : 2224 - 2240
  • [17] Sustainable Consumption in Chinese Cities: Green Purchasing Intentions of Young Adults Based on the Theory of Consumption Values
    Awuni, Joseph Agebase
    Du, Jianguo
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 24 (02) : 124 - 135
  • [18] What drives the Pioneers? Applying lifestyle theory to early electric vehicle buyers in Canada
    Axsen, Jonn
    Cairns, Josh
    Dusyk, Nichole
    Goldberg, Suzanne
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2018, 44 : 17 - 30
  • [19] Social influence and consumer preference formation for pro-environmental technology: The case of a UK workplace electric-vehicle study
    Axsen, Jonn
    Orlebar, Caroline
    Skippon, Stephen
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 95 : 96 - 107
  • [20] Social Influence, Consumer Behavior, and Low-Carbon Energy Transitions
    Axsen, Jonn
    Kurani, Kenneth S.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, VOL 37, 2012, 37 : 311 - 340