Reputational impact of Covid-19 pandemic management on World Health Organization among Indian public health professionals

被引:1
作者
Gupta, Suneel [1 ]
Pande, Neerja [2 ]
Arumugam, Thangaraja [3 ]
Sanjeev, M. A. [4 ]
机构
[1] SMS, Dept Management Studies, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] IIM Lucknow, Business Commun, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
[3] Vellore Inst Technol, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
[4] SCMHRD SIU, Dept Management, Pune, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Covid-19; organizational reputation; pandemic; public health professionals; situational crisis communication theory; World Health Organization; CRISIS RESPONSE STRATEGIES; CORPORATE REPUTATION; RESPONSIBILITY;
D O I
10.1002/pa.2842
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Organizational reputation is critical for successful stakeholder engagement. A crisis can affect the organizational reputation and alter stakeholder perception about organizations. The current study investigates the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic and its management on the World Health Organization's (WHO's) reputation among Indian public health professionals (PHPs). The study applies the situational crisis communication theory (SCCT) model to investigate the reputational impact of the pandemic on WHO among the study subjects. The study results indicate that most Indian PHPs attribute the current Pandemic to WHO. Their current reputation has dropped compared to their earlier reputation among Indian PHPs. The same is reflected in their behavioral intent, with the PHP's willingness to follow WHO guidelines on public health issues significantly reduced. The study also finds empirical support for the SCCT Model.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 76 条
[41]   Elaborating the halo effect of SCCT: how and why performance history affects crisis responsibility and organizational reputation [J].
Kim, Jarim .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC RELATIONS RESEARCH, 2017, 29 (06) :277-294
[42]  
Lakoff A., 2020, WHY DOES WHOS RESPON
[43]   QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO CONTENT VALIDITY [J].
LAWSHE, CH .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1975, 28 (04) :563-575
[44]   OBJECTIVE TESTS AS INSTRUMENTS OF PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY [J].
LOEVINGER, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1957, 3 (04) :635-694
[45]  
Lundberg C., 2013, CREDIBLE VOICE WHO B
[46]   How to turn your friends into enemies: Causes and outcomes of customers' sense of betrayal in crisis communication [J].
Ma, Liang .
PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2018, 44 (03) :374-384
[47]   Effects of attributed responsibility and response strategies on organizational reputation: A meta-analysis of situational crisis communication theory research [J].
Ma, Liang ;
Zhan, Mengqi .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC RELATIONS RESEARCH, 2016, 28 (02) :102-119
[48]   Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling [J].
MacCallum, RC ;
Browne, MW ;
Sugawara, HM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 1996, 1 (02) :130-149
[49]   Reputation Shifting [J].
Mahon, John F. ;
Mitnick, Barry M. .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, 2010, 10 (04) :280-299
[50]   APPLICATION OF CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS TO THE STUDY OF SELF-CONCEPT - 1ST ORDER AND HIGHER-ORDER FACTOR MODELS AND THEIR INVARIANCE ACROSS GROUPS [J].
MARSH, HW ;
HOCEVAR, D .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1985, 97 (03) :562-582