Lever sign test shows high diagnostic accuracy for anterior cruciate ligament injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 3299 observations

被引:5
作者
Hesmerg, Mees K. [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ]
Oostenbroek, Maurits H. W. [1 ,4 ]
van der List, Jelle P. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Orthopaed Res Alkmaar CORAL, Alkmaar, Netherlands
[2] Locat Univ Amsterdam, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Amsterdam Movement Sci, Musculoskeletal Hlth, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Dept Orthopaed Surg, Northwest Clin, Alkmaar, Netherlands
[5] Dept Orthopaed Surg & Rehabil, Atrium Hlth Wake Forest Baptist, Winston Salem, NC USA
[6] Ctr Orthopaed Res Alkmaar, Wilhelminalaan 12, NL-1815 JD Alkmaar, Netherlands
关键词
Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL); Lever Sign test; Lelli test; Diagnostic accuracy; Clinical test; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.knee.2024.01.003
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Injuries of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are common knee injuries among active and younger patients. The Lever Sign Test (LST) is a relatively newer test, of which the accuracy is disputed in the existing literature. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy with and without anesthesia of the Lever Sign test in the literature. Methods: PRISMA guidelines were followed, studies were identified using PubMed, EMBASE and Google Scholar. All studies that reported accuracy of LST performed by a clinical professional were included. Integrity of ACL was confirmed using magnetic resonance imaging or arthroscopy. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using uni- and bivariate methods. Results: After inclusion, 3299 observations in 2516 patients were included from 23 studies. Mean age was 31.8 years and 64.2% were male. Without anesthesia, sensitivity was 79.2% (95% CI 68.7-86.9) and specificity was 92.0% (95% CI 82.2-96.6). An area under the curve (AUC) of 86.1% was found. With anesthesia, sensitivity was 86.6% (95% CI 68.0-95.2), specificity was 93.4% (95% CI 84.5-97.3) and the AUC was 91.6%. Conclusion: The Lever Sign test shows very good to excellent accuracy for ACL injury, and is a useful tool for clinical practice. (c) 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 91
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, J Inst Med
[2]  
Baratloo A, 2015, EMERGENCY, V3, P48
[3]   The influence of anesthesia- body mass index and chronicity of the injury on the reliability of diagnostic tests for anterior cruciate ligament rupture [J].
Bilgin, Emre ;
Turgut, Ali ;
Hancioglu, Sertan ;
Sariekiz, Emre ;
Uzakgider, Meliksah ;
Kalenderer, Onder .
JOURNAL OF EXERCISE REHABILITATION, 2021, 17 (06) :428-434
[4]   The outcomes of total knee arthroplasty in morbidly obese patients: a systematic review of the literature [J].
Boyce, Louis ;
Prasad, Anoop ;
Barrett, Matthew ;
Dawson-Bowling, Sebastian ;
Millington, Steven ;
Hanna, Sammy A. ;
Achan, Pramod .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2019, 139 (04) :553-560
[5]   Validity of the lever sign test for the clinical diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament tears: Assessments in ski resorts [J].
Bucher, Camille ;
Lamy, Dominique ;
Debaty, Guillaume ;
Pailhe, Regis ;
Saragaglia, Dominique .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2022, 108 (03)
[6]  
Chong Alexander Cm, 2017, Iowa Orthop J, V37, P71
[7]  
Cook Chad., 2012, Orthopedic Physical Examination Tests: An Evidence- Based Approach, VSecond
[8]   The arthroscopical and radiological corelation of lever sign test for the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament rupture [J].
Deveci, Alper ;
Cankaya, Deniz ;
Yilmaz, Serdar ;
Ozdemir, Guzelali ;
Arslantas, Emrah ;
Bozkurt, Murat .
SPRINGERPLUS, 2015, 4 :1-5
[9]  
Dhakal B., 2020, Nepal Orthop Assoc J, V6, P31
[10]  
Dhar D, 2022, Int J Acad Med Pharm, V4, P512, DOI [10.47009/jamp.2022.4.4.101, DOI 10.47009/JAMP.2022.4.4.101]