Self-propulsion performance predictions of AUV based on response surface methodology

被引:8
作者
Liu, Jixin [1 ,4 ]
Yu, Fei [2 ,4 ]
Yan, Tianhong [3 ,4 ]
He, Bo [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ocean Univ China, Fac Informat Sci & Engn, Qingdao 266404, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Ocean Sci & Engn, Qingdao 266590, Peoples R China
[3] China Jiliang Univ, Sch Mech & Elect Engn, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[4] Ocean Univ China, Underwater Vehicle & Intelligent Percept & Machine, Qingdao 266404, Peoples R China
关键词
Autonomous underwater vehicle; Self-propulsion performance; Discretized propeller method; Response surface methodology; Kriging model; SURROGATE MODEL; PROPELLER; OPTIMIZATION; SIMULATION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115923
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
The self-propulsion performance of an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) is predicted based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and response surface methodology (RSM). The innovations are that a data-driven predictive framework is proposed and a model of coupled rotation speed, self-propulsion velocity and power is developed. In the present study, the discretized propeller method and multiple reference frames (MRF) model are adopted. The design of experiment (DOE) and numerical simulations are executed with inlet velocity and propeller rotation speed as inputs and drag, thrust and torque as outputs. Using the simulation results as sample data, the prediction accuracy of multiple models is compared. The polynomial model is applied to fit the response points, describing the relationship between inputs and outputs. The goodness of fit and predictive ability is assessed using the adjusted coefficient of determination (R2adj), root mean square error (RMSE) and relative error (RE). Finally, the predicted results are further validated by experiments, and all relative errors are below 6%. A linear function of self-propulsion velocity versus rotation speed and a specific cubic function of propeller input power versus self-propulsion velocity is obtained. The prediction method and achievements are beneficial for the navigation, control and safety of AUVs.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Survey on traditional and AI based estimation techniques for hydrodynamic coefficients of autonomous underwater vehicle
    Ahmed, Faheem
    Xiang, Xianbo
    Jiang, Chaicheng
    Xiang, Gong
    Yang, Shaolong
    [J]. OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2023, 268
  • [2] Effects of the advance ratio on the evolution of a propeller wake
    Baek, Dong-Geun
    Yoon, Hyun-Sik
    Jung, Jae-Hwan
    Kim, Ki-Sup
    Paik, Bu-Geun
    [J]. COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 2015, 118 : 32 - 43
  • [3] ON THE EXPERIMENTAL ATTAINMENT OF OPTIMUM CONDITIONS
    BOX, GEP
    WILSON, KB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1951, 13 (01) : 1 - 45
  • [4] Simulation of the interaction between ship and ducted propeller with a modified body force method
    Cai, Boao
    Mao, Xiaofei
    Xu, Qing
    Chai, Wei
    Tian, Binbin
    Qiu, Liaoyuan
    [J]. OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2022, 249
  • [5] Submarine propeller computations and application to self-propulsion of DARPA Suboff
    Chase, Nathan
    Carrica, Pablo M.
    [J]. OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2013, 60 : 68 - 80
  • [6] A Review of Risk Analysis Research for the Operations of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles
    Chen, Xi
    Bose, Neil
    Brito, Mario
    Khan, Faisal
    Thanyamanta, Bo
    Zou, Ting
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2021, 216
  • [7] Hydrodynamic shape optimization by high fidelity CFD solver and Gaussian process based response surface method
    Coppede, Antonio
    Gaggero, Stefano
    Vernengo, Giuliano
    Villa, Diego
    [J]. APPLIED OCEAN RESEARCH, 2019, 90
  • [8] de Kruif BJ, 2020, IEEE AUTO UNDER VEH, DOI 10.1109/AUV50043.2020.9267906
  • [9] Delen C., 2017, Tamap J. Eng., V2017
  • [10] Predicting the effect of biofouling on ship resistance using CFD
    Demirel, Yigit Kemal
    Turan, Osman
    Incecik, Atilla
    [J]. APPLIED OCEAN RESEARCH, 2017, 62 : 100 - 118