Exploring technical college student's collaborative problem solving and teamwork skills in multi-educational level engineering design teams

被引:3
作者
Herro, Danielle [1 ]
Frady, Kristin [2 ]
O'Hara, Robert [1 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Dept Educ & Human Dev, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
[2] Clemson Univ, Dept Educ & Org Leadership Dev, Clemson, SC USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Collaborative problem solving; engineering design tasks; teamwork; technical college students; WORK; IDENTITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/03043797.2023.2286315
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Manufacturing engineers work in teams with a wide range of skills and credentials. Teamwork and collaborative problem solving (CPS) skills enable higher productivity and efficiency. However, these skills are largely absent from engineering education curricula and research in contexts involving multi-educational teams inclusive of technical college engineering students. We address this gap in research and practice through a qualitative case study exploring the contributions, experiences, and perspectives of technical college students working in multi-educational level teams to solve real-world engineering manufacturing problems. Data analyses resulted in six themes: (1) positive team culture, (2) valuing industry skills, (3) sharing responsibilities to iteratively make changes, (4) applying technical roles, (5) peer interactions, and (6) career preparation. Technical college students' perceptions of challenges and successes are also discussed. Results imply that to effectively promote CPS and teamwork in similar contexts educators and industry leaders should consider the importance of (1) valuing students'/workers' current professional identities while promoting productive conflict, (2) respecting differing team roles while encouraging skill development, and (3) fostering future career skills.
引用
收藏
页码:1291 / 1311
页数:21
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Adams S., 2002, P 2002 AM SOC ENG ED, P7, DOI [https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-10049, DOI 10.18260/1-2]
[2]  
Aeby P, 2019, INT J ENG EDUC, V35, P756
[3]  
Conde MA, 2020, INT J ENG EDUC, V36, P269
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Engineering Technology Education in the United States
[5]  
Bissett-Johnson KM, 2019, Proceedings of the Design Society International Conference on Engineering Design, V1, P449, DOI [10.1017/dsi.2019.48, 10.1017/dsi.2019.48, DOI 10.1017/DSI.2019.48]
[6]  
Bockarie A., 2002, Journal of Career and Technical Education, V19, P47, DOI [https://doi.org/10.21061/jcte.v19i1.493, DOI 10.21061/jcte.v19i1.493]
[7]   Assessment of Collaborative Problem Solving in Education Environments [J].
Care, Esther ;
Scoular, Claire ;
Griffin, Patrick .
APPLIED MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, 2016, 29 (04) :250-264
[8]   A Team-based Approach to Open Coding: Considerations for Creating Intercoder Consensus [J].
Cascio, M. Ariel ;
Lee, Eunlye ;
Vaudrin, Nicole ;
Freedman, Darcy A. .
FIELD METHODS, 2019, 31 (02) :116-130
[9]  
Charmaz K., 2003, Strategies of qualitative inquiry, V2nd, P249, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.NEDT.2006.09.001
[10]  
Chen J., 2020, I2020 ASEE VIRT ANN