An opponent model for agent-based shared decision-making via a genetic algorithm

被引:1
作者
Lin, Kai-Biao [1 ]
Wei, Ying [1 ]
Liu, Yong [2 ]
Hong, Fei-Ping [3 ]
Yang, Yi-Min [4 ]
Lu, Ping [5 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ Technol, Sch Comp & Informat Engn, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[2] Xiamen Inst Technol, Sch Data Sci & Intelligent Engn, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[3] Xiamen Humanity Hosp, Dept Neonates, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[4] Xiamen Hosp Tradit Chinese Med, Dept Pediat, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[5] Xiamen Univ Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Xiamen, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2023年 / 14卷
关键词
shared decision-making (SDM); agent; auto-negotiation; genetic algorithm; opponent model; NEGOTIATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; STAKEHOLDERS; VALIDATION; SELECTION; AID;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1124734
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Introduction: Shared decision-making (SDM) has received a great deal of attention as an effective way to achieve patient-centered medical care. SDM aims to bring doctors and patients together to develop treatment plans through negotiation. However, time pressure and subjective factors such as medical illiteracy and inadequate communication skills prevent doctors and patients from accurately expressing and obtaining their opponent's preferences. This problem leads to SDM being in an incomplete information environment, which significantly reduces the efficiency of the negotiation and even leads to failure.Methods: In this study, we integrated a negotiation strategy that predicts opponent preference using a genetic algorithm with an SDM auto-negotiation model constructed based on fuzzy constraints, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of SDM by addressing the problems posed by incomplete information environments and rapidly generating treatment plans with high mutual satisfaction.Results: A variety of negotiation scenarios are simulated in experiments and the proposed model is compared with other excellent negotiation models. The results indicated that the proposed model better adapts to multivariate scenarios and maintains higher mutual satisfaction.Discussion: The agent negotiation framework supports SDM participants in accessing treatment plans that fit individual preferences, thereby increasing treatment satisfaction. Adding GA opponent preference prediction to the SDM negotiation framework can effectively improve negotiation performance in incomplete information environments.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Optimizing Selection of Biologics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Development of an Online Patient Decision Aid Using Conjoint Analysis [J].
Almario, Christopher V. ;
Keller, Michelle S. ;
Chen, Michelle ;
Lasch, Karen ;
Ursos, Lyann ;
Shklovskaya, Julia ;
Melmed, Gil Y. ;
Spiegel, Brennan M. R. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 113 (01) :58-71
[2]   Views of stakeholders on factors influencing shared decision-making in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review [J].
Alsulamy, Nouf ;
Lee, Andrew ;
Thokala, Praveen ;
Alessa, Tourkiah .
EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN HEALTH JOURNAL, 2021, 27 (03) :300-311
[3]   A BOA-based adaptive strategy with multi-party perspective for automated multilateral negotiations [J].
Amini, Mohammad ;
Fathian, Mohammad ;
Ghazanfari, Mehdi .
APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 50 (09) :2718-2748
[4]   An Evolutionary Approach for Learning Opponent's Deadline and Reserve Points in Multi-Issue Negotiation [J].
Ayachi, R. ;
Bouhani, H. ;
Ben Amor, N. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2018, 5 (03) :131-140
[5]  
Aydogan R., 2017, Modern Approaches to Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiation, P153
[6]   Pareto Bid Estimation for Multi-Issue Bilateral Negotiation under User Preference Uncertainty [J].
Bagga, Pallavi ;
Paoletti, Nicola ;
Stathis, Kostas .
IEEE CIS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS 2021 (FUZZ-IEEE), 2021,
[7]   ANEGMA: an automated negotiation model for e-markets [J].
Bagga, Pallavi ;
Paoletti, Nicola ;
Alrayes, Bedour ;
Stathis, Kostas .
AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2021, 35 (02)
[8]   Realizing Shared Decision-making in Practice [J].
Beach, Mary Catherine ;
Sugarman, Jeremy .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 322 (09) :811-812
[9]   Individual privacy in data mining using fuzzy optimization [J].
Bhuyan, Hemanta Kumar ;
Kamila, Narendra Kumar ;
Pani, Subhendu Kumar .
ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2022, 54 (08) :1305-1323
[10]   Key components of shared decision making models: a systematic review [J].
Bomhof-Roordink, Hanna ;
Gartner, Fania R. ;
Stiggelbout, Anne M. ;
Pieterse, Arwen H. .
BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (12)