Analysis by Gender and Race and Ethnicity of Reviewers and Awardees for Intramural Research Funding in the Veterans Health Administration

被引:3
|
作者
Boyer, Taylor L. [1 ]
Essien, Utibe R. [1 ,2 ]
Litam, Terrence M. A. [1 ]
Hausmann, Leslie R. M. [1 ,2 ]
Suda, Katie J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Vet Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare Syst, Ctr Hlth Equ Res & Promot, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Div Gen Internal Med, Sch Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
SEX-DIFFERENCES;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.51353
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ImportanceUnderrepresentation of women and racial and ethnic minority individuals among reviewers and funded investigators in health research has been widely reported. It is unknown whether such underrepresentation exists in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). ObjectiveTo describe gender and racial and ethnic makeup of VHA Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) study sections and funding awardees and to explore the associations between gender and racial and ethnic makeup of study sections and awardees who were women and racial and ethnic minority individuals. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional study at the VHA evaluated study section members and funding awardees from 5 review cycles from March 13, 2018, through March 6, 2020, identified via the HSR&D and National Institutes of Health websites. Main Outcomes and MeasuresUnivariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the likelihood of an awardee being a woman or a racial or ethnic minority individual based on the gender and racial and ethnic makeup of study sections, respectively. Separate models were conducted for investigator-initiated research proposals only. ResultsThirty-six study sections comprised 664 reviewers, including 381 women (57.4%) and 81 racial and ethnic minority individuals (12.2%). Of the 146 funded proposals, 77 (52.7%) were awarded to women and 25 (17.1%) to racial and ethnic minority investigators; 29 (19.9%) were reviewed by study sections with no racial and ethnic minority reviewers. The odds of a woman awardee weremore than 5 times greater for proposals reviewed by study sections comprising the highest proportion of women (fourth quartile; >58.3%) than the lowest proportion of women (first quartile; <= 50.0%) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.24 [95% CI, 1.70-16.13]). Similarly, the odds of a racial or ethnic minority awardee were 3 times greater for proposals reviewed by study sections in the top 50th percentile for proportion of racial and ethnic minority individuals (>7.3%) than the bottom 50th percentile (aOR, 3.08 [95% CI, 1.18-8.09]). Secondary analyses limited to investigator-initiated research proposals identified similar associations. Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cross-sectional study of VHA HSR&D-funded research, racial and ethnic minority individuals were underrepresented among investigators and reviewers. More women and racial and ethnic minority reviewers on study sections were associated with women and racial and ethnic minority individuals awarded funding.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Compensation of Otolaryngologists in the Veterans Health Administration: Is There a Gender Gap?
    Dermody, Sarah M.
    Litvack, Jamie R.
    Randall, James A.
    Malekzadeh, Sonya
    Maxwell, Jessica H.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2019, 129 (01) : 113 - 118
  • [2] Gender Differences in Prescribing of Zolpidem in the Veterans Health Administration
    Jasuja, Guneet K.
    Reisman, Joel I.
    Wiener, Renda Soylemez
    Christopher, Melissa L.
    Rose, Adam J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 2019, 25 (03) : E58 - +
  • [3] Analysis of Physician Compensation Studies by Gender, Race, and Ethnicity
    Larson, Allison R.
    Englander, Meridith J.
    Youmans, Quentin R.
    Verduzco-Gutierrez, Monica
    Stanford, Fatima Cody
    Strong, Sheritta A.
    Liu, Howard Y.
    Silver, Julie K.
    HEALTH EQUITY, 2022, 6 (01) : 59 - 71
  • [4] Beyond sex and gender difference in funding and reporting of health research
    Olena Hankivsky
    Kristen W. Springer
    Gemma Hunting
    Research Integrity and Peer Review, 3 (1)
  • [5] Beyond sex and gender difference in funding and reporting of health research
    Hankivsky, Olena
    Springer, Kristen W.
    Hunting, Gemma
    RESEARCH INTEGRITY AND PEER REVIEW, 2018, 3 (01)
  • [6] Difficulty Orientations, Gender, and Race/Ethnicity: An Intersectional Analysis of Pathways to STEM Degrees
    Nix, Samantha
    Perez-Felkner, Lara
    SOCIAL SCIENCES-BASEL, 2019, 8 (02):
  • [7] Gender Differences in Outcomes Following Specialized Intensive PTSD Treatment in the Veterans Health Administration
    Stefanovics, Elina A.
    Rosenheck, Robert A.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAUMA-THEORY RESEARCH PRACTICE AND POLICY, 2020, 12 (03) : 272 - 280
  • [8] A systematic analysis of UK cancer research funding by gender of primary investigator
    Zhou, Charlie D.
    Head, Michael G.
    Marshall, Dominic C.
    Gilbert, Barnabas J.
    El-Harasis, Majd A.
    Raine, Rosalind
    O'Connor, Henrietta
    Atun, Rifat
    Maruthappu, Mahiben
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (04):
  • [9] Gender differences in grant and personnel award funding rates at the Canadian Institutes of Health Research based on research content area: A retrospective analysis
    Burns, Karen E. A.
    Straus, Sharon E.
    Liu, Kuan
    Rizvi, Leena
    Guyatt, Gordon
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2019, 16 (10)
  • [10] A Report of the Women's Health Congress Workshop on The Health of Women of Color: A Critical Intersection at the Corner of Sex/Gender and Race/Ethnicity
    Plank-Bazinet, Jennifer L.
    Kornstein, Susan G.
    Clayton, Janine Austin
    McCaskill-Stevens, Worta
    Wood, Lauren
    Cook, Nakela
    Tajuddin, Salman M.
    Brown, Gina M.
    Harris, Tamara
    Evans, Michele K.
    Begg, Lisa
    Brooks, Claudette E.
    Miller, Leah R.
    Mistretta, Amy Caroline
    Cornelison, Terri L.
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2016, 25 (01) : 4 - 10