Influence of Preoperative Disability on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

被引:3
|
作者
Nie, James W. [1 ]
Hartman, Timothy J. [1 ]
Oyetayo, Omolabake O. [1 ]
Zheng, Eileen [1 ]
MacGregor, Keith R. [1 ]
Massel, Dustin H. [1 ]
Sayari, Arash J. [1 ]
Singh, Kern [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
ALIF; Patient-reported outcomes; Minimum clinically important difference; Oswestry disability index; IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; INDEX; PAIN; SURGERY; UTILITY; SCORES; SPINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2022.12.024
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
-BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the influ-ence of preoperative disability through the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) on clinical outcomes in patients -ndergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). -METHODS: Patients undergoing ALIF were separated into 2 groups based on ODI<41 (lower disability) versus ODI double dagger 41% (higher disability). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected at preoperative and postoperative 6-week/12-week/6-month/1-year/2-year time points. Physical function PROs were Patient-Reported Outcomes Measure-ment Information System Physical Function and 12-item Short Form Physical Component Score. Mental function PROs were 12-item Short Form Mental Component Score and Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Pain PROs were visual analog scale back and visual analog scale leg. ODI was the disability PRO. -RESULTS: A total of 148 patients were identified, with 52 patients with lower disability. Higher disability patients demonstrated significant improvement in mental function (P 5 0.010, all). Lower disability patients demonstrated superior postoperative PROs in physical function, mental function, back pain, and disability outcomes (P5 0.034, all). Minimum clinically important difference achievement rates for lower disability patients were higher for back pain and lower for mental function and disability outcomes (P 5 0.041, all). -CONCLUSIONS: Independent of preoperative disability, patients undergoing ALIF reported significant postoperative improvement in physical function, pain, and disability outcomes. Patients with lower preoperative disability continued to report superior PROs in mental function, back pain, and disability postoperatively. Minimum clinically important difference achievement rates for lower disability patients were higher for back pain and lower in mental function and disability outcomes. Patients undergoing ALIF with higher preoperative disability may experience greater clinically meaningful improvement in mental function and disability.
引用
收藏
页码:E412 / E421
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical Outcomes of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis Preoperative Diagnosis and Surgical Strategy
    Watanabe, Kei
    Yamazaki, Akiyoshi
    Morita, Osamu
    Sano, Atsuki
    Katsumi, Keiichi
    Ohashi, Masayuki
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2011, 24 (03): : 137 - 141
  • [22] The Influence of Common Medical Conditions on the Outcome of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Kalb, Samuel
    Perez-Orribo, Luis
    Kalani, Mohammad Yashar S.
    Snyder, Laura A.
    Martirosyan, Nikolay L.
    Burns, Keven
    Standerfer, Robert J.
    Kakarla, Udaya K.
    Dickman, Curtis A.
    Theodore, Nicholas
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2016, 29 (07): : 285 - 290
  • [23] Factors Affecting Postoperative Length of Stay in Patients Undergoing Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Kuo, Cathleen C.
    Hess, Ryan M.
    Khan, Asham
    Pollina, John
    Mullin, Jeffrey P.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 155 : E538 - E547
  • [24] Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Ploumis, Avraam
    Wu, Chunhui
    Fischer, Gustav
    Mehbod, Amir A.
    Wu, Wentien
    Faundez, Antonio
    Transfeldt, Ensor E.
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2008, 21 (02): : 120 - 125
  • [25] A systematic review of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF)
    Rathbone, John
    Rackham, Matthew
    Nielsen, David
    Lee, So Mang
    Hing, Wayne
    Riar, Sukhman
    Scott-Young, Matthew
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 32 (06) : 1911 - 1926
  • [26] Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Elderly Patients: Peri- and Postoperative Complications and Clinical Outcome
    Jesse, Christopher M.
    Mayer, Lea
    Hani, Levin
    Goldberg, Johannes
    Raabe, Andreas
    Schwarzenbach, Othmar
    Schar, Ralph T.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART A-CENTRAL EUROPEAN NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 84 (06) : 548 - 557
  • [27] Does Preoperative Symptom Duration Impact Clinical Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Ambulatory Setting?
    Nie, James W.
    Hartman, Timothy J.
    MacGregor, Keith R.
    Oyetayo, Omolabake O.
    Zheng, Eileen
    Singh, Kern
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 166 : E599 - E606
  • [28] Clinical analysis of preoperative risk factors for the incidence of deep venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Wei, Jingchao
    Li, Wenyi
    Pei, Yueying
    Shen, Yong
    Li, Jia
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2016, 11
  • [29] Frailty predicts non-home discharge in anterior lumbar interbody fusion patients
    Asserson, Derek B.
    Alaouieh, Danielle A.
    Roy, Joanna M.
    Schmidt, Meic H.
    Bowers, Christian A.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL SCIENCES, 2024,
  • [30] Impact of Time to Surgery for Patients Using Workers' Compensation Insurance Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Preliminary Analysis of Clinical Outcomes
    Patel, Madhav R.
    Jacob, Kevin C.
    Lynch, Conor P.
    Cha, Elliot D. K.
    Patel, Saajan D.
    Prabhu, Michael C.
    Vanjani, Nisheka N.
    Pawlowski, Hanna
    Singh, Kern
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 160 : E421 - E429