Which Energy Security Union? An experiment on public preferences for energy union alternatives in 5 western European countries

被引:7
作者
Nicoli, Francesco [1 ,2 ,3 ]
van der Duin, David [2 ,4 ]
Burgoon, Brian [4 ]
机构
[1] Neurosci Inst Torino, Turin, Italy
[2] Univ Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
[3] Bruegel Inst, Saint Josse Ten Noode, Belgium
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
European union; Survey experiment; Energy union; European integration; Russian invasion of Ukraine; Public opinion;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113734
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The Russian invasion of Ukraine caught the European Union (EU) off-balance, leading some to propose a relaunch of the EU's Energy Union. However, the political feasibility of such programmes remains disputed, and any such policy design is inherently multidimensional with respect to scope, governance, source of financing and other dimensions. To determine public support for energy security cooperation, we conduct a (first ever) conjoint experiment on public support for alternative energy union designs, fielded among a highly representative sample of the French, German, Italian, Dutch and Spanish populations in November 2022. This multidimensional conjoint experiment allows us to determine the causal link between (hypothetical) policy features of potential energy solidarity pacts, and public support or opposition to such policy. Our results show that policy packages receiving the most support have higher levels of ambition, joint EU-level governance, joint purchases and pro-curement. All-in-all our results reveal considerable cross-border support for energy solidarity, indicating that a compromise policy is feasible and publicly supported. Furthermore, our results suggest that European citizens are willing to support the creation of joint institutions to face issues of common concern, suggesting that major crises open windows of opportunity to re-shape European integration.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 44 条
[21]  
European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER), 2021, Estimated number and diversity of supply sources 2021
[22]   European solidarity in times of crisis: the role of information and media use [J].
Goldberg, Andreas C. ;
Gattermann, Katjana ;
Marquart, Franziska ;
Brosius, Anna ;
de Vreese, Claes H. .
WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2021, 44 (5-6) :1314-1328
[23]   Soft power with a hard edge: EU policy tools and energy security [J].
Goldthau, Andreas ;
Sitter, Nick .
REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2015, 22 (05) :941-965
[24]   The 2014 Ukraine-Russia crisis: Implications for energy markets and scholarship [J].
Goldthau, Andreas ;
Boersma, Tim .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2014, 3 :13-15
[25]   Institutional reform and public attitudes toward EU decision making [J].
Hahm, Hyeonho ;
Hilpert, David ;
Koenig, Thomas .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 59 (03) :599-623
[26]   Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments [J].
Hainmueller, Jens ;
Hopkins, Daniel J. ;
Yamamoto, Teppei .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2014, 22 (01) :1-30
[27]  
Hoffmann I., 2022, End of Summer, End of Solidarity? Euopinions
[28]   A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus [J].
Hooghe, Liesbet ;
Marks, Gary .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 39 :1-23
[29]  
Judge A, 2017, EUR J INT SECUR, V2, P179, DOI 10.1017/eis.2017.3
[30]   Together we stand? Transnational solidarity in the EU in times of crises [J].
Katsanidou, Alexia ;
Reinl, Ann-Kathrin ;
Eder, Christina .
EUROPEAN UNION POLITICS, 2022, 23 (01) :66-78