Do geopolitical risks facilitate the global energy transition? Evidence from 39 countries in the world

被引:20
|
作者
Wang, Shanyong [1 ]
Wang, Jing [1 ]
Wang, Wenfu [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Publ Affairs, Hefei 230026, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Sch Econ, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Geopolitical risks; Energy transition; Financial incentive; Energy efficiency level; Government governance capacity; OIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103952
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Geopolitical risks exert a profoundly detrimental impact on global economy, investment and resource security. Do geopolitical risks affect the worldwide energy transition remains open and controversial. To complement research related to geopolitical risks and energy transition, this research checks the influence of geopolitical risks on energy transition. Based on data collected from 39 countries from 2003 to 2019, it reveals that geopolitical risks exert a promotion influence on energy transition, including energy consumption transition and energy production transition. Moreover, the influence of geopolitical risks on energy transition can be further amplified by improving financial incentive, energy efficiency level and government governance capacity. That is, financial incentive, energy efficiency level and government governance capacity can positively moderate the influence of geopolitical risks on energy transition. Additionally, heterogeneous analysis further uncovers that the influence of geopolitical risks on energy transition varies across economic level and regions. Specifically, the influence of geopolitical risks on energy production transition is relatively high in European and American developed countries, while the influence of geopolitical risks on energy consumption transition is more obvious in Asian, African and Latin American developing countries. Current findings are valuable for governments and scholars to promote energy transition.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The effect of geopolitical risk on the clean energy metals' prices: the evidence of BRICS countries
    Tuna, Gulfen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREEN ENERGY, 2024, 21 (16) : 3779 - 3793
  • [42] THE IMPACT OF GEOPOLITICAL RISKS ON FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT: EVIDENCE FROM EMERGING MARKETS
    Lu, Zhou
    Gozgor, Giray
    Huang, Mai
    Lau, Marco Chi Keung
    JOURNAL OF COMPETITIVENESS, 2020, 12 (01) : 93 - 107
  • [43] Effects of geopolitical risks on trade flows: evidence from the gravity model
    Gupta, Rangan
    Gozgor, Giray
    Kaya, Huseyin
    Demir, Ender
    EURASIAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2019, 9 (04) : 515 - 530
  • [44] Effects of geopolitical risks on trade flows: evidence from the gravity model
    Rangan Gupta
    Giray Gozgor
    Huseyin Kaya
    Ender Demir
    Eurasian Economic Review, 2019, 9 : 515 - 530
  • [45] Will geopolitical risks only inhibit corporate investment? Evidence from China
    Lai, Fujun
    Xiong, Deping
    Zhu, Sha
    Li, Yunzhong
    Tan, Yanzhi
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2023, 82
  • [46] Would geopolitical risks be the new driver of the energy transition? An empirical study on renewable energy technology innovation
    Zhang, Ying
    Liu, Baoliu
    Xue, Jinjun
    Chen, Yiming
    Zhao, Fang
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2025, 141
  • [47] Energy transition as a solution for energy security risk: Empirical evidence from BRI countries
    Aslam, Naveed
    Yang, Wanping
    Saeed, Rabia
    Ullah, Fahim
    ENERGY, 2024, 290
  • [48] Economic policy uncertainty, geopolitical risks, energy output and ecological footprint-Empirical evidence from China
    Jiao, Yusheng
    Xiao, Xuemeng
    Bao, Xiao
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 : 324 - 334
  • [49] The intersection of geopolitical risks and energy investments: lessons from BRICS nations
    Zheng, Kaixin
    Xu, Runguo
    DEFENCE AND PEACE ECONOMICS, 2025,
  • [50] Global geopolitical risk and financial stability: Evidence from China
    Zhu, Sha
    Xia, Yuqin
    Li, Qiuxuan
    Chen, Yunjia
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2025, 72