Differences in intracortical responses following non-noxious and noxious stimulation in anaesthetized rats

被引:0
作者
Lykholt, L. E. D. [1 ]
Morch, C. D. [1 ]
Jensen, W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Ctr Neuroplast & Pain CNAP, Dept Hlth Sci & Technol, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Electrical stimulation; Intracortical; Nociception; Non-noxious; Noxious; Rat; SOMATOSENSORY-EVOKED-POTENTIALS; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; FIELD POTENTIALS; PAIN; CORTEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.brainres.2023.148564
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Cortical responses have been proposed as a source for the extraction of unique and non-subjective sensory information. The present study aimed to investigate if it is possible to distinguish between non-noxious and noxious cortical responses with two different types of anesthesia. Sixteen rats were randomly allocated to receive either Hypnorm/Dormicum (HD) or isoflurane (ISO) anesthesia. Each animal had a custom-made microelectrode array implanted in the primary somatosensory cortex to record the local field potentials and a cuff electrode implanted around the sciatic nerve to deliver electrical stimulations. Three stimulation intensities were applied: 1x movement threshold (MT) (i.e., non-noxious activation), 5x MT (low intensity noxious activation), and 10x MT (high intensity noxious activation). The evoked potentials were assessed by extracting three features: 1) the negative peak (NP), 2) the positive peak (PP), and 3) the peak-to-peak (PtP) amplitudes. Our results showed that it was possible to distinguish between three levels of stimulation intensities based on the NP, PP, and PtP features for the HD group, whereas it was only possible to make the same differentiation with the use of PP and PtP when applying ISO. This work is believed to contribute to a basic understanding of how the cortical responses change in the hyperacute phase of pain and which cortical features may be suitable as objective measures of nociception.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Isoflurane blunts electroencephalographic and thalamic-reticular formation responses to noxious stimulation in goats
    Antognini, JF
    Carstens, E
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 91 (06) : 1770 - 1779
  • [2] Effects of different propofol infusion rates on EEG activity and AEP responses in rats
    Antunes, LM
    Roughan, JV
    Flecknell, PA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2003, 26 (05) : 369 - 376
  • [3] A fMRI study of brain activations during non-noxious and noxious electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve of rats
    Chang, C
    Shyu, BC
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH, 2001, 897 (1-2) : 71 - 81
  • [4] Validation of Digital Visual Analog Scale Pain Scoring With a Traditional Paper-based Visual Analog Scale in Adults
    Delgado, Domenica A.
    Lambert, Bradley S.
    Boutris, Nickolas
    McCulloch, Patrick C.
    Robbins, Andrew B.
    Moreno, Michael R.
    Harris, Joshua D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS GLOBAL RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2018, 2 (03):
  • [5] Methods Used to Evaluate Pain Behaviors in Rodents
    Deuis, Jennifer R.
    Dvorakova, Lucie S.
    Vetter, Irina
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MOLECULAR NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 10
  • [6] Flecknell P., 2009, Anaesthesia, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-369376-1.X0001-9, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-369376-1.X0001-9]
  • [7] Behavioral states, network states, and sensory response variability
    Fontanini, Alfredo
    Katz, Donald B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 100 (03) : 1160 - 1168
  • [8] Pain perception and response: Central nervous system mechanisms
    Hudson, AJ
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2000, 27 (01) : 2 - 16
  • [9] PAIN-RELATED SOMATOSENSORY EVOKED-POTENTIALS FOLLOWING CO2-LASER STIMULATION IN MAN
    KAKIGI, R
    SHIBASAKI, H
    IKEDA, A
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 74 (02): : 139 - 146
  • [10] Kandel E. R., 2000, Principles of Neural Science, V4