Neighborhood Incarceration Rates and Adverse Birth Outcomes in New York City, 2010-2014

被引:7
作者
Holaday, Louisa W. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Tolliver, Destiny G. [4 ]
Moore, Tiana [5 ]
Thompson, Keitra [4 ,6 ]
Wang, Emily A. [3 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Div Gen Internal Med, Dept Med, New York, NY USA
[2] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Inst Hlth Equ Res, New York, NY USA
[3] Yale Univ, SEICHE Ctr Hlth & Justice, New Haven, CT USA
[4] Yale Univ, Natl Clinician Scholars Program, New Haven, CT USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Ctr Vulnerable Populat, San Francisco, CA USA
[6] Yale Univ, Yale Sch Publ Health, Dept Social & Behav Sci, New Haven, CT USA
[7] Yale Univ, Yale Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Sect Gen Med, New Haven, CT USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
INFANT-MORTALITY RATES; PRETERM BIRTH; MASS INCARCERATION; WEIGHT; HEALTH; US;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.6173
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE The US has high rates of adverse birth outcomes, with substantial racial disparities augmented by stress and neighborhood disadvantage. Black people are more likely to live in neighborhoods with high rates of incarceration, which is a source of both stress and neighborhood disadvantage and, thus, may contribute to adverse birth outcomes. OBJECTIVE To determine whether neighborhoods with high incarceration rates also have higher rates of adverse birth outcomes compared with neighborhoods with lower rates. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cross-sectional study used publicly available data from the New York City Department of Health (2010-2014). Censored Poisson regression, with the US Census tract as the unit of analysis, was used to examine the association of neighborhood incarceration rate and birth outcomes. Multivariable models included percentage of births aggregated to the Census tract by maternal factors (age, parity, singleton vs multiple birth, insurance, and race) and neighborhood factors (poverty, education, and violent crime). Analyses were performed between May 2021 and October 2022. EXPOSURE Neighborhood incarceration rate, categorized into quintiles. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of preterm birth and low birth weight. Secondary outcomes were IRRs of very preterm birth, extremely preterm birth, and very low birth weight. Hypotheses were formulated before data collection. RESULTS Among 2061 Census tracts with 562 339 births, incarceration rates varied from 0 to 4545 people incarcerated per 100 000, and high-incarceration neighborhoods had more residents of Black race (54.00% vs 1.90%), living in poverty (32.30% vs 10.00%), and without a general educational development equivalent (28.00% vs 12.00%) compared with low-incarceration neighborhoods. In fully adjusted models, high-incarceration neighborhoods had a 13% higher IRR of preterm birth (IRR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.08-1.18), 45% higher IRR of very preterm birth (IRR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.24-1.71), 125% higher IRR of extremely preterm birth (IRR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.59-3.18), 10% higher IRR of low birth weight (IRR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05-1.16), and 52% higher IRR of very low birth weight compared with low-incarceration neighborhoods (IRR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.28-1.81). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Neighborhood incarceration rate was positively associated with adverse birth outcomes, particularly those associated with infant mortality. Black people were significantly more likely to live in high-incarceration neighborhoods, suggesting that mass incarceration may contribute to racial disparities in birth outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2011-2015 acs 5-year estimates (dataset)
  • [2] Racial Residential Segregation and Preterm Birth Built Environment as a Mediator
    Anthopolos, Rebecca
    Kaufman, Jay S.
    Messer, Lynne C.
    Miranda, Marie Lynn
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 25 (03) : 397 - 405
  • [3] The prevalence of socioeconomic and behavioral characteristics and their impact on very low birth weight in black and white infants in Georgia.
    Berg C.J.
    Wilcox L.S.
    d'Almada P.J.
    [J]. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2001, 5 (2) : 75 - 84
  • [4] Blau R., 2022, CITY
  • [5] The impact of the increasing number of multiple births on the rates of preterm birth and low birthweight: An international study
    Blondel, B
    Kogan, MD
    Alexander, GR
    Dattani, N
    Kramer, MS
    Macfarlane, A
    Wen, SW
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2002, 92 (08) : 1323 - 1330
  • [6] Boyd RW., 2020, HLTH AFFAIRS BLOG, DOI [10.1377/hblog20200630.939347, 10.1377/forefront.20200630.939347, 10.1377/hblog20200630.939347/full/, DOI 10.1377/HBLOG20200630.939347/FULL/?UTM_MEDIUM=SOCIAL&UTM_SOUR]
  • [7] Explaining the Black-White Disparity in Preterm Birth: A Consensus Statement From a Multi-Disciplinary Scientific Work Group Convened by the March of Dimes
    Braveman, Paula
    Dominguez, Tyan Parker
    Burke, Wylie
    Dolan, Siobhan M. M.
    Stevenson, David K. K.
    Jackson, Fleda Mask
    Collins Jr, James W. W.
    Driscoll, Deborah A. A.
    Haley, Terinney
    Acker, Julia
    Shaw, Gary M. M.
    McCabe, Edward R. B.
    Hay Jr, William W. W.
    Thornburg, Kent
    Acevedo-Garcia, Dolores
    Cordero, Jose F.
    Wise, Paul H. H.
    Legaz, Gina
    Rashied-Henry, Kweli
    Frost, Jordana
    Verbiest, Sarah
    Waddell, Lisa
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2021, 3
  • [8] Racial disparities in preterm birth in USA: a biosensor of physical and social environmental exposures
    Burris, Heather H.
    Lorch, Scott A.
    Kirpalani, Haresh
    Pursley, DeWayne M.
    Elovitz, Michal A.
    Clougherty, Jane E.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2019, 104 (10) : 931 - 935
  • [9] The contribution of preterm birth to infant mortality rates in the United States
    Callaghan, William M.
    MacDorman, Marian F.
    Rasmussen, Sonja A.
    Qin, Cheng
    Lackritz, Eve M.
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2006, 118 (04) : 1566 - 1573
  • [10] Why Is Infant Mortality Higher in the United States than in Europe?
    Chen, Alice
    Oster, Emily
    Williams, Heidi
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2016, 8 (02) : 89 - 124