Machining the mind to mind the machine

被引:2
作者
Hancock, P. A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Psychol, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] Univ Cent Florida, Inst Simulat & Training, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
关键词
Ergonomics; future of work; automation; autonomy; efficiency; human-machine collaboration; GINI COEFFICIENT; TECHNOLOGY; FUTURE; WORK; AUTOMATION; HEDONOMICS; HISTORY; DESIGN; SHARES;
D O I
10.1080/1463922X.2022.2062067
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
Ergonomics is identified as that discipline which is most particularly focused upon the"laws of work'. Indeed, this is the etymological origins from which the name of the science is derived. In consequence, any future consideration of such an area of research endeavor must constantly re-examine and re-evaluate what is meant by the term 'work' The present article, that features an individual perspective, attacks this challenge through a prospective vision of what work may come. This vision of futurework proves to be a rather bleak one. For, as is explained, the driving economic forces emphasize and embrace the greater utility of automated, and now growing autonomous systems, to accomplish the tasks which connote work. Often cast in opposition to the efficiency/profit imperative are those social forces for which human-centered endeavors, such as Ergonomics, advocate. Optimistic perspectives seek to harmonize these conflicting forces and envisage a form of harmonious cooperation between humans and machines of increasing 'intelligence' and capability. The current work explores and evaluates why that positive narrative is unlikely to represent the actuality of coming events, at least within the foreseeable future.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 128
页数:18
相关论文
共 107 条
[91]   How unrealistic optimism is maintained in the face of reality [J].
Sharot, Tali ;
Korn, Christoph W. ;
Dolan, Raymond J. .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 14 (11) :1475-U156
[92]  
Sheridan T. B., 2005, Rev. Hum. Factors Ergonom., V1, P89, DOI [DOI 10.1518/155723405783703082, 10.1518/155723405783703082]
[93]   Commentary: extraordinary excitement empowering enhancing everyone [J].
Shneiderman, Ben .
HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2022, 37 (03) :243-245
[94]   Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthy [J].
Shneiderman, Ben .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2020, 36 (06) :495-504
[95]  
Sleek, 2021, RAGE MACHINES
[96]  
Smith D.E., 2003, J OCCUP SCI, V10, P61, DOI DOI 10.1080/14427591.2003.9686512
[97]   Turing in the driver's seat: Can people distinguish between automated and manually driven vehicles? [J].
Stanton, Neville A. ;
Eriksson, Alexander ;
Banks, Victoria A. ;
Hancock, Peter A. .
HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS IN MANUFACTURING & SERVICE INDUSTRIES, 2020, 30 (06) :418-425
[98]   Existential threat as a challenge for individual and collective engagement: Climate change and the motivation to act [J].
Stollberg, Janine ;
Jonas, Eva .
CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 42 :145-150
[99]   How AI can be a force for good [J].
Taddeo, Mariarosaria ;
Floridi, Luciano .
SCIENCE, 2018, 361 (6404) :751-752