Meat consumption & positive mental health: A scoping review

被引:7
作者
Dobersek, Urska [1 ]
Bender, Mary [1 ]
Etienne, Alexandria [1 ]
Gil, Gabriela E. Fernandez [1 ]
Hostetter, Claire [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Indiana, Dept Psychol, Evansville, IN 47712 USA
关键词
Meat; Beef; Omnivory; Vegetarianism; Veganism; Positive psychology; Positive psychological functioning; REPORTED ENERGY-INTAKE; SEX-DIFFERENCES; COGNITIVE FUNCTION; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; VEGETARIAN; NUTRITION; OPTIMISM; DIET; ANXIETY; LIFE;
D O I
10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102556
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The objective of this scoping review was to examine the breadth of the existing literature on the relation between meat consumption or meat abstention and positive psychological functioning. In April 2022, we conducted a systematic search of online databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) for primary research examining positive psychological functioning in meat consumers and those who abstain from meat. Thirteen studies met the inclusion/exclusion criteria, representing 89,138 participants (54,413 females and 33,863 males) with 78,562 meat consumers and 10,148 meat abstainers (13-102 years) from multiple geographic regions. The primary outcomes were life satisfaction, "positive mental health", self-esteem, and vigor. The secondary outcomes were "meaning in life", optimism, positive emotions, and psycho-logical well-being. Eight of the 13 studies demonstrated no differences between the groups on positive psy-chological functioning, three studies showed mixed results, and two studies showed that compared to meat abstainers, meat consumers had greater self-esteem, "positive mental health", and "meaning in life". Studies varied substantially in methods and outcomes. Although a small minority of studies showed that meat consumers had more positive psychological functioning, no studies suggested that meat abstainers did. There was mixed evidence for temporal relations, but study designs precluded causal inferences. Our review demonstrates the need for future research given the equivocal nature of the extant literature on the relation between meat con-sumption and meat abstention and positive psychological functioning.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 120 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, MENTAL HLTH STRENGTH
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1948, PREAMBLE CONSTITUTIO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Serial No. 114-29: Hearing before the Committee on Agriculture
[4]  
Antonovsky A, 1979, Perceiving the World as Coherent. Antonovsky A, Health, Stress, P123
[5]   Falsehoods and facts about dietary sugars: a call for evidence-based policy [J].
Archer, Edward ;
Arjmandi, Bahram .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION, 2021, 61 (22) :3725-3739
[6]   The Failure to Measure Dietary Intake Engendered a Fictional Discourse on Diet-Disease Relations [J].
Archer, Edward ;
Lavie, Carl J. ;
Hill, James O. .
FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2018, 5
[7]   Controversy and debate: Memory-Based Methods Paper 1: the fatal flaws of food frequency questionnaires and other memory-based dietary assessment methods [J].
Archer, Edward ;
Marlow, Michael L. ;
Lavie, Carl J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 104 :113-124
[8]   Controversy and Debate: Memory Based Methods Paper 3: Nutrition's 'Black Swans': Our reply [J].
Archer, Edward ;
Marlow, Michael L. ;
Lavie, Carl J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 104 :130-135
[9]   In Defense of Sugar: A Critique of Diet-Centrism [J].
Archer, Edward .
PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2018, 61 (01) :10-19
[10]   The Inadmissibility of What We Eat in America and NHANES Dietary Data in Nutrition and Obesity Research and the Scientific Formulation of National Dietary Guidelines [J].
Archer, Edward ;
Pavela, Gregory ;
Lavie, Carl J. .
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2015, 90 (07) :911-926