Media Exposure, Political Predispositions, and Conspiracy Theories: Explaining Chinese Beliefs in COVID Origins

被引:0
作者
Ma, Deyong [1 ]
Lu, Ming [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Univ, Sch Govt, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[2] Renmin Univ China, Sch Int Studies, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Renmin Univ China, Room 334,Pinyuan Bldg 4, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China
关键词
PARANORMAL BELIEF; CENSORSHIP; TRUST;
D O I
10.1093/ijpor/edae006
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This article examines the underpinning mechanisms of the Chinese public's belief in two opposing conspiracy theories on the origins of coronavirus disease 2019. Utilizing survey data from 4,251 Chinese internet users, our study reveals both the universality and distinctiveness of mechanisms involved in conspiracy theory beliefs. The distinctiveness primarily emanates from the political system and its media environment, while universality is mainly attributed to the cognitive style of intuitive thinking. In China's political system, exposure to either domestic or foreign media sources exerts substantial influence on public conspiracy beliefs. Notably, we emphasize the mediating role of political ideologies in domestic media exposure. Exposure to domestic media is more likely to lead conservative individuals to reject the conspiracy asserting COVID-19 originated in a lab in China. Concurrently, nationalism mediates foreign media exposure, reinforcing convictions of U.S.-centered conspiracies. This research shows how media narratives, molded by the political context, generate divergent perspectives on conspiracy theories in China. Furthermore, given the role of intuitive thinking in conspiracy beliefs, our findings highlight the potential for cultivating a more rational society through the promotion of analytical thinking, which requires the public to employ a deliberative and conscious cognitive process when exposed to highly politicized media content.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Perceived expert and laypeople consensus predict belief in local conspiracy theories in a non-WEIRD culture: Evidence from Turkey [J].
Alper, Sinan ;
Yelbuz, Busra Elif ;
Konukoglu, Kivanc .
JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING, 2023, 18
[2]   The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 [J].
Andersen, Kristian G. ;
Rambaut, Andrew ;
Lipkin, W. Ian ;
Holmes, Edward C. ;
Garry, Robert F. .
NATURE MEDICINE, 2020, 26 (04) :450-452
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, 21st Century
[4]   Political paranoia v. political realism: on distinguishing between bogus conspiracy theories and genuine conspiratorial politics [J].
Bale, Jeffrey M. .
PATTERNS OF PREJUDICE, 2007, 41 (01) :45-60
[5]   RATIONAL FUNDAMENTALISM? AN EXPLANATORY MODEL OF FUNDAMENTALIST BELIEFS [J].
Baurmann, Michael .
EPISTEME-A JOURNAL OF INDIVIDUAL AND SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY, 2007, 4 (02) :150-166
[6]   Partisanship, Information, and Perceptions of Government Corruption [J].
Blais, Andre ;
Gidengil, Elisabeth ;
Kilibarda, Anja .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH, 2017, 29 (01) :95-110
[7]   How scientific reasoning correlates with health-related beliefs and behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic? [J].
Cavojova, Vladimira ;
Srol, Jakub ;
Ballova Mikuskova, Eva .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 27 (03) :534-547
[8]   Neighborhood Governance and Happiness during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Empirical Analysis of Wuhan's Lockdown [J].
Cheng, Hanbei ;
Jiang, Anli .
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2023, 13 (06)
[9]   Does Self-Love or Self-Hate Predict Conspiracy Beliefs? Narcissism, Self-Esteem, and the Endorsement of Conspiracy Theories [J].
Cichocka, Aleksandra ;
Marchlewska, Marta ;
de Zavala, Agnieszka Golec .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE, 2016, 7 (02) :157-166
[10]   Conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorizing [J].
Clarke, S .
PHILOSOPHY OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2002, 32 (02) :131-150