Thermal investigation and bi-objective optimization of a multi-product system with concentrated solar system

被引：3

作者：

Malik, Muhammad Zeeshan ^{[1
]}

Yahya, S. I. ^{[2
,3
]}

Ali, Amjad ^{[4
]}

Solomin, E. ^{[5
]}

Hadrawi, Salema K. ^{[6
]}

Rezaei, A. ^{[7
]}

机构：

[1] Taizhou Univ, Sch Elect & Informat Engn, Taizhou 318000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China

[2] Cihan Univ Erbil, Dept Commun & Comp Engn, Erbil, Iraq

[3] Koya Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Software Engn, KOY45, Koya, Iraq

[4] King Fahad Univ Petr & Minerals, Interdisciplinary Res Ctr Renewable Energy & Power, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia

[5] South Ural State Univ, Inst Engn & Technol, Dept Elect Power Generat Stn Network & Supply Syst, 76 Lenin Ave, Chelyabinsk 454080, Russia

[6] Islamic Univ, Coll Tech Engn, Refrigerat & Air Conditioning Tech Engn Dept, Najaf, Iraq

[7] Kermanshah Univ Technol, Dept Elect Engn, Kermanshah, Iran

来源：

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY | 2024年 / 51卷

关键词：

Multi-generation systems; Exergo-economic; Exergy analysis; Hydrogen production; ENERGY; MULTIGENERATION; PERFORMANCE; SIMULATION; EXERGY; CYCLE;

D O I：

10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.06.142

中图分类号：

O64 [物理化学（理论化学）、化学物理学];

学科分类号：

070304 ; 081704 ;

摘要：

The current research is conducted with the aim of investigating a multi-generation energy system (MGS) for electricity, hydrogen, heating, cooling and hot water production using SRC, Kalina cycle and proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysis as the main subsystems. The thermodynamic analysis namely energy, exergy, and exergo-economic examination carried out. Analysis for each component is done after thermodynamic modeling. The exergy investi-gation showed that regenerator 2, vapor generator and condenser had the highest exergy destruction rate, respectively. A comparison was made between the current work and the basic system, and according to the results obtained, the system's ability to produce electricity, cooling, heating and hydrogen are calculated as 782 kW, 173.2 kW, 2265 kW and 0.01613 mol/day, respectively. Also, the energy and exergy efficiency of the proposed system increased by 3.13% and 5.37%, respectively. The optimization based on PSO method was carried out. The results of PSO optimization represented that in the case exergy destruction and exergy efficiency will be the optimization target these two outputs can reach the value of 2208 kW and 9.84%, while optimization based on exergy efficiency and production cost rate will lead to 9.86% and 166.6 $/h.(c) 2023 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：1421 / 1436

页数：16

共 40 条

[1] Investigation and thermo-economic analysis of solar condensation refrigeration [J].

Abed, Azher M. ;

Hadrawi, Salema K. ;

Smaisim, Ghassan F. ;

Muftah, Ali F. ;

Jahanbin, Farnaz .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOW-CARBON TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 19 :185-191

[2] A comprehensive approach for tri-objective optimization of a novel advanced energy system with gas turbine prime mover, ejector cooling system and multi-effect desalination [J].

Ahmadi, P. ;

Fakhari, I. ;

Rosen, Marc A. .

ENERGY, 2022, 254

[3] Energetic and exergetic studies of a multigenerational solar-geothermal system [J].

Al-Ali, M. ;

Dincer, I. .

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 71 (01) :16-23

[4] Simulation and investigation of bioethanol production considering energetic and economic considerations [J].

Alaiwi, Yaser ;

Abed, Azher M. ;

Smaisim, Ghassan Fadhil ;

Aly, Mohamed Aly Saad ;

Hadrawi, Salema K. ;

Morovati, Reza .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOW-CARBON TECHNOLOGIES, 2023, 18 :191-203

[5] Multi-objective design optimization of a multi-generation energy system based on geothermal and solar energy [J].

Alirahmi, Seyed Mojtaba ;

Dabbagh, Sajjad Rahmani ;

Ahmadi, Pouria ;

Wongwises, Somchai .

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 205

[6]

Bejan A., 1995, Thermal Design and Optimization

[7]

Cengel Y.A., 2015, Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach, V8, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

[8] Exergetic optimization of a thermoacoustic engine using the particle swarm optimization method [J].

Chaitou, Hussein ;

Nika, Philippe .

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 55 :71-80

[9] A review on exergy comparison of hydrogen production methods from renewable energy sources [J].

Christopher, Koroneos ;

Dimitrios, Rovas .

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2012, 5 (05) :6640-6651

[10] Renewable-energy-based multigeneration systems [J].

Dincer, I. ;

Zamfirescu, C. .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2012, 36 (15) :1403-1415

← 1 2 3 4 →