Addressing unmeasured confounders in cohort studies: Instrumental variable method for a time-fixed exposure on an outcome trajectory

被引:1
作者
Le Bourdonnec, Kateline [1 ,3 ]
Samieri, Cecilia [1 ]
Tzourio, Christophe [1 ]
Mura, Thibault [2 ]
Mishra, Aniket [1 ]
Tregout, David-Alexandre [1 ]
Proust-Lima, Cecile [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bordeaux, Inserm, BPH, U1219, Bordeaux, France
[2] Univ Montpellier, Inst Neurosci Montpellier INM, INSERM, Montpellier, France
[3] Univ Bordeaux, Inserm, BPH, U1219, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
关键词
causality; cohort study; instrumental variable; mixed model; repeated data; CAUSAL INFERENCE; MODELS; RISK; ASSOCIATION; ESTIMATORS; DEMENTIA; HAZARDS;
D O I
10.1002/bimj.202200358
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Instrumental variable methods, which handle unmeasured confounding by targeting the part of the exposure explained by an exogenous variable not subject to confounding, have gained much interest in observational studies. We consider the very frequent setting of estimating the unconfounded effect of an exposure measured at baseline on the subsequent trajectory of an outcome repeatedly measured over time. We didactically explain how to apply the instrumental variable method in such setting by adapting the two-stage classical methodology with (1) the prediction of the exposure according to the instrumental variable, (2) its inclusion into a mixed model to quantify the exposure association with the subsequent outcome trajectory, and (3) the computation of the estimated total variance. A simulation study illustrates the consequences of unmeasured confounding in classical analyses and the usefulness of the instrumental variable approach. The methodology is then applied to 6224 participants of the 3C cohort to estimate the association of type-2 diabetes with subsequent cognitive trajectory, using 42 genetic polymorphisms as instrumental variables. This contribution shows how to handle endogeneity when interested in repeated outcomes, along with a R implementation. However, it should still be used with caution as it relies on instrumental variable assumptions hardly testable in practice.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Vascular factors and risk of dementia: Design of the three-city study and baseline characteristics of the study population
    Alperovitch, A
    [J]. NEUROEPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 22 (06) : 316 - 325
  • [2] Compensatory mechanisms in higher-educated subjects with Alzheimer's disease: a study of 20 years of cognitive decline
    Amieva, Helene
    Mokri, Hind
    Le Goff, Melanie
    Meillon, Celine
    Jacqmin-Gadda, Helene
    Foubert-Samier, Alexandra
    Orgogozo, Jean-Marc
    Stern, Yaakov
    Dartigues, Jean-Francois
    [J]. BRAIN, 2014, 137 : 1167 - 1175
  • [3] Weak Instruments in Instrumental Variables Regression: Theory and Practice
    Andrews, Isaiah
    Stock, James H.
    Sun, Liyang
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS, VOL 11, 2019, 2019, 11 : 727 - 753
  • [4] Instrumental variables and interactions in the causal analysis of a complex clinical trial
    Bond, Simon J.
    White, Ian R.
    Walker, A. Sarah
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (07) : 1473 - 1496
  • [5] Burgess S., 2018, ARXIV
  • [6] A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization
    Burgess, Stephen
    Small, Dylan S.
    Thompson, Simon G.
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (05) : 2333 - 2355
  • [7] Commenges D., 2015, MODELES BIOSTATISTIQ
  • [8] Reading Mendelian randomisation studies: a guide, glossary, and checklist for clinicians
    Davies, Neil M.
    Holmes, Michael V.
    Smith, George Davey
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 362
  • [9] Efron B., 1993, INTRO BOOTSTRAP, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9
  • [10] A tutorial on the use of instrumental variables in pharmacoepidemiology
    Ertefaie, Ashkan
    Small, Dylan S.
    Flory, James H.
    Hennessy, Sean
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2017, 26 (04) : 357 - 367