Adaptation and Validation of a French Version of the Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) Scale

被引:5
作者
Eisenblaetter, Margot [1 ]
Madiouni, Clarisse [1 ]
Laraki, Yasmine [1 ,2 ]
Capdevielle, Delphine [2 ,3 ]
Raffard, Stephane [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montpellier, Univ Paul Valery Montpellier 3, Fac Psychol, Lab EPSYLON EA 4556, F-34090 Montpellier, France
[2] Univ Montpellier, Univ Dept Adult Psychiat, Hop La Colombiere, CHU Montpellier, F-34090 Montpellier, France
[3] Univ Montpellier, Inserm Neuropsychiat Epidemiol & Clin Res, F-34090 Montpellier, France
关键词
vaccine; vaccination attitudes; vaccination behaviours; vaccination intentions; scale development; HESITANCY; RESPONSES; BARRIERS; INTERNET; BELIEFS; TRENDS;
D O I
10.3390/vaccines11051001
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Over the past decades, vaccination has proven to be largely beneficial to global health. Despite vaccine efficacy, the French population has been recently affected by more anti-vaccination attitudes and vaccine refusal, and it is therefore necessary to validate tools to study this health issue. The Vaccination Attitudes Examination scale (VAX) is a 12-item questionnaire targeting adults that assesses general attitudes towards vaccination. The aims of the study were to translate and adapt the original English version of the scale into French and to test the psychometric properties of the scale in a French-population-based sample of adults. We included 450 French speaking adults that completed the French VAX and other questionnaires to assess convergent and divergent validities. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses showed that the French version of the VAX replicated the factorial structure of the original scale. Moreover, it demonstrated high internal consistency, good convergent and divergent validities, and excellent temporal stability. Furthermore, scores on the scale differentiated vaccinees from non-vaccinee respondents. Results on the scale provide us with insight into factors involved in vaccine hesitancy in France, therefore allowing French authorities and policy makers to address these specific concerns and improve vaccine acceptance rates in this country.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Vaccination greatly reduces disease, disability, death and inequity worldwide [J].
Andre, F. E. ;
Booy, R. ;
Bock, H. L. ;
Clemens, J. ;
Datta, S. K. ;
John, T. J. ;
Lee, B. W. ;
Lolekha, S. ;
Peltola, H. ;
Ruff, T. A. ;
Santosham, M. ;
Schmitt, H. J. .
BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2008, 86 (02) :140-146
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, ERIC DOCUMENT REPROD
[3]   Editorial: Scale Development and Score Validation [J].
Badenes-Ribera, Laura ;
Silver, N. Clayton ;
Pedroli, Elisa .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 11
[4]   Conducting Online Surveys [J].
Ball, Helen L. .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN LACTATION, 2019, 35 (03) :413-417
[5]   Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Bombardier, C ;
Guillemin, F ;
Ferraz, MB .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) :3186-3191
[6]   Selection Bias in Web Surveys [J].
Bethlehem, Jelke .
INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL REVIEW, 2010, 78 (02) :161-188
[7]   Measuring individual significant change on the Beck Depression Inventory-II through IRT-based statistics [J].
Brouwer, Danny ;
Meijer, Rob R. ;
Zevalkink, Jolien .
PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2013, 23 (05) :489-501
[8]   Factors underlying parental decisions about combination childhood vaccinations including MMR: A systematic review [J].
Brown, Katrina F. ;
Kroll, J. Simon ;
Hudson, Michael J. ;
Ramsay, Mary ;
Green, John ;
Long, Susannah J. ;
Vincent, Charles A. ;
Fraser, Graham ;
Sevdalis, Nick .
VACCINE, 2010, 28 (26) :4235-4248
[9]   Vaccination Programs for Adults in Europe, 2019 [J].
Cassimos, Dimitrios C. ;
Effraimidou, Evgnosia ;
Medic, Snezana ;
Konstantinidis, Theoharis ;
Theodoridou, Maria ;
Maltezou, Helena C. .
VACCINES, 2020, 8 (01)
[10]   Participant Carelessness and Fraud: Consequences for Clinical Research and Potential Solutions [J].
Chandler, Jesse ;
Sisso, Itay ;
Shapiro, Danielle .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 129 (01) :49-55