Labor process theory and critical HRM: A systematic review and agenda for future research

被引:12
作者
Omidi, Afshin [1 ]
Dal Zotto, Cinzia [1 ]
Gandini, Alessandro [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Neuchatel, Inst Management, Fac Econ & Business, CH-2000 Neuchatel, Switzerland
[2] Univ Milan, Dept Social & Polit Sci, Via Conservatorio 7, I-20122 Milan, Italy
关键词
Critical HRM; Critical management studies; Employment relationships; Human resource management; Labor process theory; CRITICAL SOCIAL-SCIENCE; DISCONNECTED CAPITALISM; PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT; SOFTWARE-DEVELOPMENT; SERVICE WORK; KNOWLEDGE; UK; EXPERIENCES; EDUCATION; IDENTITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.emj.2023.05.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Labor process theory (LPT) is a critical approach to studies on work and employment; it is rooted in the Marxist tradition, which addresses conflictual relations between capital and labor and connects work transformations with broader structural contexts. LPT has been one of the theoretical lenses through which critical human resource management (HRM) scholars have attempted to challenge taken-for-granted concepts and approaches introduced by mainstream, positivist, and functionalist HRM research. Yet, an effort to consolidate its significance in critical HRM is missing in the extant literature. Drawing on a systematic review of 103 research articles published from 2000 to 2021, the present paper identified four key themes in previous LPT-informed HRM research, including institutional forces, control regimes, solidarity and resistance, and the deskilling-upskilling paradox. Based on this review, the article discusses what critical HRM scholars can learn from this collective understanding of LPT and how they could also employ this theory to advance critical HRM research. The main argument brought forward is the idea that LPT is worthwhile to challenge the excessive optimism propagated by the pluralist approaches in HRM.
引用
收藏
页码:899 / 913
页数:15
相关论文
共 168 条
[1]   The future of critical management studies: A paleo-Marxist critique of labour process theory [J].
Adler, Paul S. .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2007, 28 (09) :1313-1345
[2]   Workplace Bullying: Not a Manager's Right? [J].
Akella, Devi .
SAGE OPEN, 2016, 6 (01)
[3]   Mobility strategies, 'mobility differentials' and 'transnational exit': the experiences of precarious migrants in London's hospitality jobs [J].
Alberti, Gabriella .
WORK EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIETY, 2014, 28 (06) :865-881
[4]   ON THE IDEA OF EMANCIPATION IN MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION STUDIES [J].
ALVESSON, M ;
WILLMOTT, H .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1992, 17 (03) :432-464
[5]  
Alvesson M., 2009, The Routledge companion to strategic human resource management, P52
[6]   Unraveling HRM:: Identity, ceremony, and control in a management consulting firm [J].
Alvesson, Mats ;
Karreman, Dan .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2007, 18 (04) :711-723
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century
[8]   Common Good HRM: A paradigm shift in Sustainable HRM? [J].
Aust , Ina ;
Matthews, Brian ;
Muller-Camen, Michael .
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2020, 30 (03)
[9]   Coercive Care: Control and Coercion in the Restructured Care Workplace [J].
Baines, Donna ;
van den Broek, Diane .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2017, 47 (01) :125-142