A likelihood-based sensitivity analysis for publication bias on the summary receiver operating characteristic in meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy

被引:2
作者
Zhou, Yi [1 ]
Huang, Ao [1 ]
Hattori, Satoshi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Biomed Stat, Osaka, Japan
[2] Osaka Univ, Inst Open & Transdisciplinary Res Initiat, Integrated Frontier Res Med Sci Div, Osaka, Japan
关键词
diagnostic test accuracy; meta-analysis; publication bias; sensitivity analysis; summary receiver operating characteristic; COPAS SELECTION MODEL; SAMPLE SELECTION; CURVE;
D O I
10.1002/sim.9643
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy, the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve is a recommended method to summarize the diagnostic capacity of a medical test in the presence of study-specific cutoff values. The SROC curve can be estimated by bivariate modeling of pairs of sensitivity and specificity across multiple diagnostic studies, and the area under the SROC curve (SAUC) gives the aggregate estimate of diagnostic test accuracy. However, publication bias is a major threat to the validity of the estimates. To make inference of the impact of publication bias on the SROC curve or the SAUC, we propose a sensitivity analysis method by extending the likelihood-based sensitivity analysis of Copas. In the proposed method, the SROC curve or the SAUC are estimated by maximizing the likelihood constrained by different values of the marginal probability of selective publication under different mechanisms of selective publication. A cutoff-dependent selection function is developed to model the selective publication mechanism via the t -type statistics or P -value of the linear combination of the logit-transformed sensitivity and specificity from the published studies. It allows us to model selective publication suggested by the funnel plots of sensitivity, specificity, or diagnostic odds ratio, which are often observed in practice. A real meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy is re-analyzed to illustrate the proposed method, and simulation studies are conducted to evaluate its performance.
引用
收藏
页码:781 / 798
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison and validation of metadta for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies
    Nyaga, Victoria N.
    Arbyn, Marc
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2023, 14 (03) : 544 - 562
  • [32] A METAANALYTIC METHOD FOR SUMMARIZING DIAGNOSTIC-TEST PERFORMANCES - RECEIVER-OPERATING-CHARACTERISTIC SUMMARY POINT ESTIMATES
    MIDGETTE, AS
    STUKEL, TA
    LITTENBERG, B
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1993, 13 (03) : 253 - 257
  • [33] Meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis for multi-arm trials with selection bias
    Chootrakool, Hathaikan
    Shi, Jian Qing
    Yue, Rongxian
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 30 (11) : 1183 - 1198
  • [34] Journal quality, effect size, and publication bias in meta-analysis
    Murtaugh, PA
    ECOLOGY, 2002, 83 (04) : 1162 - 1166
  • [35] Exercise as a treatment for depression: A meta-analysis adjusting for publication bias
    Schuch, Felipe B.
    Vancampfort, Davy
    Richards, Justin
    Rosenbaum, Simon
    Ward, Philip B.
    Stubbs, Brendon
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2016, 77 : 42 - 51
  • [36] Detecting and correcting for publication bias in meta-analysis - A truncated normal distribution approach
    Zhu, Qiaohao
    Carriere, K. C.
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 27 (09) : 2722 - 2741
  • [37] Improving the error rates of the Begg and Mazumdar test for publication bias in fixed effects meta-analysis
    Gjerdevik, Miriam
    Heuch, Ivar
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2014, 14
  • [38] Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies with multiple thresholds for data integration
    Shim, Sung Ryul
    EPIDEMIOLOGY AND HEALTH, 2022, 44
  • [39] Some Methods for Addressing Publication Bias in Statistical Meta-analysis
    Albertine, April
    THAILAND STATISTICIAN, 2016, 14 (01): : 15 - 24
  • [40] Improving the error rates of the Begg and Mazumdar test for publication bias in fixed effects meta-analysis
    Miriam Gjerdevik
    Ivar Heuch
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14