A likelihood-based sensitivity analysis for publication bias on the summary receiver operating characteristic in meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy

被引:2
|
作者
Zhou, Yi [1 ]
Huang, Ao [1 ]
Hattori, Satoshi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Biomed Stat, Osaka, Japan
[2] Osaka Univ, Inst Open & Transdisciplinary Res Initiat, Integrated Frontier Res Med Sci Div, Osaka, Japan
关键词
diagnostic test accuracy; meta-analysis; publication bias; sensitivity analysis; summary receiver operating characteristic; COPAS SELECTION MODEL; SAMPLE SELECTION; CURVE;
D O I
10.1002/sim.9643
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy, the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve is a recommended method to summarize the diagnostic capacity of a medical test in the presence of study-specific cutoff values. The SROC curve can be estimated by bivariate modeling of pairs of sensitivity and specificity across multiple diagnostic studies, and the area under the SROC curve (SAUC) gives the aggregate estimate of diagnostic test accuracy. However, publication bias is a major threat to the validity of the estimates. To make inference of the impact of publication bias on the SROC curve or the SAUC, we propose a sensitivity analysis method by extending the likelihood-based sensitivity analysis of Copas. In the proposed method, the SROC curve or the SAUC are estimated by maximizing the likelihood constrained by different values of the marginal probability of selective publication under different mechanisms of selective publication. A cutoff-dependent selection function is developed to model the selective publication mechanism via the t -type statistics or P -value of the linear combination of the logit-transformed sensitivity and specificity from the published studies. It allows us to model selective publication suggested by the funnel plots of sensitivity, specificity, or diagnostic odds ratio, which are often observed in practice. A real meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy is re-analyzed to illustrate the proposed method, and simulation studies are conducted to evaluate its performance.
引用
收藏
页码:781 / 798
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A test for publication bias in meta-analysis with sparse binary data
    Schwarzer, Guido
    Antes, Gerd
    Schumacher, Martin
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (04) : 721 - 733
  • [22] Diagnostic test accuracy: methods for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Campbell, Jared M.
    Klugar, Miloslav
    Ding, Sandrine
    Carmody, Dennis P.
    Hakonsen, Sasja J.
    Jadotte, Yuri T.
    White, Sarahlouise
    Munn, Zachary
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHCARE, 2015, 13 (03) : 154 - 162
  • [23] Investigation of publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a meta-epidemiological study
    W Annefloor van Enst
    Eleanor Ochodo
    Rob JPM Scholten
    Lotty Hooft
    Mariska M Leeflang
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14
  • [24] Investigation of publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a meta-epidemiological study
    van Enst, W. Annefloor
    Ochodo, Eleanor
    Scholten, Rob J. P. M.
    Hooft, Lotty
    Leeflang, Mariska M.
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2014, 14
  • [25] Composite likelihood-based meta-analysis of breast cancer association studies
    Ioannis Politopoulos
    Jane Gibson
    William Tapper
    Sarah Ennis
    Diana Eccles
    Andrew Collins
    Journal of Human Genetics, 2011, 56 : 377 - 382
  • [26] Composite likelihood-based meta-analysis of breast cancer association studies
    Politopoulos, Ioannis
    Gibson, Jane
    Tapper, William
    Ennis, Sarah
    Eccles, Diana
    Collins, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2011, 56 (05) : 377 - 382
  • [27] Diagnostic test meta-analysis by empirical likelihood under a Copas-like selection model
    Mengke Li
    Yan Fan
    Yang Liu
    Yukun Liu
    Metrika, 2021, 84 : 927 - 947
  • [28] The implications of publication bias for meta-analysis' other parameter
    Jackson, Dan
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2006, 25 (17) : 2911 - 2921
  • [29] Empirical Comparison of Publication Bias Tests in Meta-Analysis
    Lin, Lifeng
    Chu, Haitao
    Murad, Mohammad Hassan
    Hong, Chuan
    Qu, Zhiyong
    Cole, Stephen R.
    Chen, Yong
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 33 (08) : 1260 - 1267
  • [30] Empirical Comparison of Publication Bias Tests in Meta-Analysis
    Lifeng Lin
    Haitao Chu
    Mohammad Hassan Murad
    Chuan Hong
    Zhiyong Qu
    Stephen R. Cole
    Yong Chen
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2018, 33 : 1260 - 1267