Restrictive Versus Liberal Fluid Regimen in Refractory Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:3
作者
Abdelbaky, Ahmed M. [1 ]
Elmasry, Wael G. [2 ]
Awad, Ahmed H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rashid Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Crit Care, Dubai Acad Hlth Corp, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
[2] Rashid Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Anesthesiol, Dubai Acad Hlth Corp, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
关键词
restrictive fluid regimen; liberal fluid regimen; septic shock; sepsis; fluid regimen; INITIAL MANAGEMENT; RESUSCITATION; DEFINITIONS; ADULTS;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.47783
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The optimal fluid management strategy for patients with sepsis remains a topic of debate. This meta -analysis aims to evaluate the impact of restrictive versus liberal fluid regimens on mortality, adverse events, and other clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis. We systematically reviewed 11 randomized controlled trials published between 2008 and 2023, comprising a total of 4,121 participants. The studies assessed 90 -day mortality, 30-day mortality, adverse events, hospital length of stay, ICU admission rate, mechanical ventilation, ventilator-free days, ICU-free days, and vasopressor-free days. Quality assessments indicated minimal bias across the studies. The meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference in 90-day mortality between restrictive and liberal fluid regimens (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.70; P=0.30). Similar results were observed for 30-day mortality (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.30 to 1.80; P=0.50). Adverse events were comparable between the two groups (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.19; P=0.28). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in hospital length of stay (OR, 0.47; 95% CI,-0.85 to 1.80; P=0.48) or ICU admission rate (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.77; P=0.75) between the restrictive and liberal fluid regimens. Regarding mechanical ventilation and ventilator-free days, no significant distinctions were observed (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.17; P=0.48; OR, 0.99; 95% CI,-0.17 to 2.15; P=0.09, respectively). ICU-free days and vasopressor-free days also showed no significant differences between the two groups (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, -0.28 to 2.21; P=0.13; OR,-0.38; 95% CI,-1.14 to 0.37; P=0.32, respectively). This comprehensive meta -analysis of clinical trials suggests that restrictive and liberal fluid management strategies have comparable outcomes in patients with sepsis, including mortality, adverse events, and various clinical parameters. However, most studies favored restrictive fluid regimen over liberal approach regarding the number of vasopressor-free days, need for mechanical ventilation, adverse events, 30-day mortality, and 90-day mortality in sepsis patients.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Role of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Adults and Children With Refractory Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Yang, Yufan ;
Xiao, Zhenghui ;
Huang, Jiaotian ;
Gong, Ling ;
Lu, Xiulan .
FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2022, 9
[42]   Norepinephrine in Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Ruslan, Muhammad Azfar ;
Baharuddin, Kamarul Aryffin ;
Noor, Norhayati Mohd ;
Yazid, Mohd Boniami ;
Noh, Abu Yazid Md ;
Rahman, Andey .
WESTERN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 22 (02) :196-203
[43]   OUTCOMES OF PEDIATRIC FLUID-REFRACTORY SEPTIC SHOCK ACCORDING TO DIFFERENT VASOACTIVE STRATEGIES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS [J].
Marchetto, Luca ;
Zanetto, Lorenzo ;
Comoretto, Rosanna I. ;
Padrin, Davide ;
Menon, Kusum ;
Amigoni, Angela ;
Daverio, Marco .
SHOCK, 2024, 62 (05) :599-611
[44]   Is restrictive fluid resuscitation beneficial not only for hemorrhagic shock but also for septic shock? A meta-analysis [J].
Jiang, Shuaiyu ;
Wu, Mengmeng ;
Lu, Xiaoguang ;
Zhong, Yilong ;
Kang, Xin ;
Song, Yi ;
Fan, Zhiwei .
MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (12) :E25143
[45]   The role of albumin as a resuscitation fluid for patients with sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Delaney, Anthony P. ;
Dan, Arina ;
McCaffrey, John ;
Finfer, Simon .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (02) :386-391
[46]   THERAPEUTIC PLASMA EXCHANGE IN CHILDREN WITH SEVERE SEPSIS AND SEPTIC SHOCK: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS [J].
Lee, O. P. ;
Lee, O. P. ;
Kanesan, N. ;
Leow, E. H. ;
Sultana, R. ;
Chor, Y. ;
Gan, C. ;
Lee, J. ;
Lee, J. .
PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (11)
[47]   The Impact of Timing of Antibiotics on Outcomes in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Sterling, Sarah A. ;
Miller, W. Ryan ;
Pryor, Jason ;
Puskarich, Michael A. ;
Jones, Alan E. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 43 (09) :1907-1915
[48]   Childhood Mortality After Fluid Bolus With Septic or Severe Infection Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Yue, Jing ;
Zheng, Ronghao ;
Wei, Huiping ;
Li, Jie ;
Wu, Jiannan ;
Wang, Ping ;
Zhao, Hui .
SHOCK, 2021, 56 (02) :158-166
[49]   The efficacy and safety of plasma exchange in patients with sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Emily Rimmer ;
Brett L Houston ;
Anand Kumar ;
Ahmed M Abou-Setta ;
Carol Friesen ;
John C Marshall ;
Gail Rock ;
Alexis F Turgeon ;
Deborah J Cook ;
Donald S Houston ;
Ryan Zarychanski .
Critical Care, 18
[50]   Effect of delayed antibiotic use on mortality outcomes in patients with sepsis or septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Tang, Fajuan ;
Yuan, Hongxiu ;
Li, Xihong ;
Qiao, Lina .
INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 129