Restrictive Versus Liberal Fluid Regimen in Refractory Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:3
作者
Abdelbaky, Ahmed M. [1 ]
Elmasry, Wael G. [2 ]
Awad, Ahmed H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rashid Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Crit Care, Dubai Acad Hlth Corp, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
[2] Rashid Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Anesthesiol, Dubai Acad Hlth Corp, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
关键词
restrictive fluid regimen; liberal fluid regimen; septic shock; sepsis; fluid regimen; INITIAL MANAGEMENT; RESUSCITATION; DEFINITIONS; ADULTS;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.47783
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The optimal fluid management strategy for patients with sepsis remains a topic of debate. This meta -analysis aims to evaluate the impact of restrictive versus liberal fluid regimens on mortality, adverse events, and other clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis. We systematically reviewed 11 randomized controlled trials published between 2008 and 2023, comprising a total of 4,121 participants. The studies assessed 90 -day mortality, 30-day mortality, adverse events, hospital length of stay, ICU admission rate, mechanical ventilation, ventilator-free days, ICU-free days, and vasopressor-free days. Quality assessments indicated minimal bias across the studies. The meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference in 90-day mortality between restrictive and liberal fluid regimens (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.70; P=0.30). Similar results were observed for 30-day mortality (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.30 to 1.80; P=0.50). Adverse events were comparable between the two groups (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.19; P=0.28). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in hospital length of stay (OR, 0.47; 95% CI,-0.85 to 1.80; P=0.48) or ICU admission rate (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.77; P=0.75) between the restrictive and liberal fluid regimens. Regarding mechanical ventilation and ventilator-free days, no significant distinctions were observed (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.17; P=0.48; OR, 0.99; 95% CI,-0.17 to 2.15; P=0.09, respectively). ICU-free days and vasopressor-free days also showed no significant differences between the two groups (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, -0.28 to 2.21; P=0.13; OR,-0.38; 95% CI,-1.14 to 0.37; P=0.32, respectively). This comprehensive meta -analysis of clinical trials suggests that restrictive and liberal fluid management strategies have comparable outcomes in patients with sepsis, including mortality, adverse events, and various clinical parameters. However, most studies favored restrictive fluid regimen over liberal approach regarding the number of vasopressor-free days, need for mechanical ventilation, adverse events, 30-day mortality, and 90-day mortality in sepsis patients.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Frequency and mortality of sepsis and septic shock in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Yan-Cun Liu ;
Ying Yao ;
Mu-Ming Yu ;
Yu-Lei Gao ;
An-Long Qi ;
Tian-Yu Jiang ;
Zhen-Sen Chen ;
Song-Tao Shou ;
Yan-Fen Chai .
BMC Infectious Diseases, 22
[22]   Fluid resuscitation in children with severe infection and septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Sankar, Jhuma ;
Das, Rashmi Ranjan ;
Banothu, Kiran Kumar .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2024, 183 (09) :3925-3932
[23]   Coupled plasma filtration adsorption for the treatment of sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Li, Yuting ;
Li, Hongxiang ;
Guo, Jianxing ;
Wang, Youquan ;
Zhang, Dong .
BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 22 (01)
[24]   Coupled plasma filtration adsorption for the treatment of sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Yuting Li ;
Hongxiang Li ;
Jianxing Guo ;
Youquan Wang ;
Dong Zhang .
BMC Infectious Diseases, 22
[25]   The association between levosimendan and mortality in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Ge, Zengzheng ;
Gao, Yanxia ;
Lu, Xin ;
Yu, Shiyuan ;
Qin, Mubing ;
Gong, Chao ;
Walline, Joseph Harold ;
Zhu, Huadong ;
Li, Yi .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 31 (02) :90-97
[26]   Mortality among adult patients with sepsis and septic shock in Korea: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Namgung, Myeong ;
Ahn, Chiwon ;
Park, Yeonkyung ;
Kwak, Il-Youp ;
Lee, Jungguk ;
Won, Moonho .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2023, 10 (02) :157-171
[27]   Corticosteroids in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review, Pairwise, and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis [J].
Pitre, Tyler ;
Drover, Katherine ;
Chaudhuri, Dipayan ;
Zeraaktkar, Dena ;
Menon, Kusum ;
Gershengorn, Hayley B. ;
Jayaprakash, Namita ;
Spencer-Segal, Joanna L. ;
Pastores, Stephen M. ;
Nei, Andrea M. ;
Annane, Djillali ;
Rochwerg, Bram .
CRITICAL CARE EXPLORATIONS, 2024, 6 (01) :E1000
[28]   Effectiveness of polymyxin B-immobilized hemoperfusion against sepsis and septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Li, Xiaoming ;
Liu, Chao ;
Mao, Zhi ;
Qi, Shuang ;
Song, Renjie ;
Zhou, Feihu .
JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2021, 63 :187-195
[29]   Midregional-proAdrenomedullin as a prognostic tool in sepsis and septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Valeriani, Emanuele ;
Falletta, Antonio ;
Pastori, Daniele ;
Porfidia, Angelo ;
Mastroianni, Claudio Maria ;
Di Bari, Silvia ;
Motta, Eleonora ;
Pignatelli, Pasquale ;
Oliva, Alessandra .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2024, 54 (09)
[30]   Comparison of culture-negative and culture-positive sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Li, Yuting ;
Guo, Jianxing ;
Yang, Hongmei ;
Li, Hongxiang ;
Shen, Yangyang ;
Zhang, Dong .
CRITICAL CARE, 2021, 25 (01)