Measuring eco-efficiency of rice cropping systems in Iran: An integrated economic and environmental approach

被引:3
|
作者
Kouchaki-Penchah, Hamed [1 ]
Alizadeh, Mohammad Reza [1 ]
Aghamolki, Mohammad Taghi Karbalaei [2 ]
机构
[1] Rice Res Inst Iran, Rasht, Iran
[2] Deputy Rice Res Inst Iran, Amol, Iran
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Techno-economic analysis; Eco-efficiency; Rice; Cropping system; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; GUILAN PROVINCE; IMPACTS; ENERGY; OPTIMIZATION; JOINT;
D O I
10.1016/j.seta.2023.103281
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article provides detailed inventory data of existing cropping systems and measures the environmental burdens, economic performance, and eco-efficiency of rice production. Techno-economic analysis (TEA), life cycle assessment (LCA), and eco-efficiency are used as investigation methodologies. Direct field emission is the main environmental hotspot in most impact categories of rice cultivation. Increasing the eco-efficiency of rice production in each cropping system could be achieved by regulating the use of fuel, chemical fertilizers, and pesticides on the farm. Double culture shows better eco-efficiency over monoculture due to relatively higher economic performance and better environmental impacts per tonne of rice production. Ratoon emits fewer pollutants than second cultivation per hectare due to the usage of limited inputs and the absence of some stages of rice production. It leads to a higher eco-efficiency than second cultivation because the lower total costs offset the low yield of ratoon compared to second cultivation. According to this research, the "primary cultivation and ratoon" rice cropping system maximizes eco-efficiency. This conclusion should also apply to countries attempting to increase or achieve self-sufficiency in rice production.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of the eco-efficiency of territorial districts with seaport economic activities
    Quintano, Claudio
    Mazzocchi, Paolo
    Rocca, Antonella
    UTILITIES POLICY, 2021, 71
  • [32] Measuring Eco-Efficiency of Agriculture in China
    Pang, Jiaxing
    Chen, Xingpeng
    Zhang, Zilong
    Li, Hengji
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (04)
  • [33] Ranking Decision Making for Eco-Efficiency Using Operational, Energy, and Environmental Efficiency
    Lee, Pyoungsoo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (06)
  • [34] A Novel Machine Learning Approach Combined with Optimization Models for Eco-efficiency Evaluation
    Mirmozaffari, Mirpouya
    Yazdani, Maziar
    Boskabadi, Azam
    Dolatsara, Hamidreza Ahady
    Kabirifar, Kamyar
    Golilarz, Noorbakhsh Amiri
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (15):
  • [35] The eco-efficiency of rapeseed and sunflower cultivation in Italy. Joining environmental and economic assessment
    Forleo, Maria Bonaventura
    Palmieri, Nadia
    Suardi, Alessandro
    Coaloa, Domenico
    Pari, Luigi
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 172 : 3138 - 3153
  • [37] A simulation-based decision support for eco-efficiency improvements in production systems
    Sproedt, A.
    Plehn, J.
    Schoensleben, P.
    Herrmann, C.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 105 : 389 - 405
  • [38] Research on the Eco-Efficiency of Rice Production and Its Improvement Path: A Case Study from China
    Huang, Malan
    Zeng, Linlin
    Liu, Chujie
    Li, Xiaoyun
    Wang, Hongling
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (14)
  • [39] The Economic Value of Corporate Eco-Efficiency
    Guenster, Nadja
    Bauer, Rob
    Derwall, Jeroen
    Koedijk, Kees
    EUROPEAN FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2011, 17 (04) : 679 - 704
  • [40] Eco-Efficiency Assessment of Water Systems in China
    Liu, Yuyu
    Sun, Caizhi
    Xu, Shiguo
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2013, 27 (14) : 4927 - 4939