Clinical Impact of a Sepsis Alert System Plus Electronic Sepsis Navigator Using the Epic Sepsis Prediction Model in the Emergency Department

被引:2
|
作者
Schertz, Adam R. [1 ,3 ]
Smith, Sydney A. [2 ]
Lenoir, Kristin M. [2 ]
Thomas, Karl W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Sect Pulmonol, Crit Care Allergy & Immunol Dis,Dept Internal Med, Winston Salem, NC USA
[2] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Dept Biostat & Data Sci, Div Publ Hlth Sci, Winston Salem, MS USA
[3] Atrium Hlth Wake Forest Baptist, 1 Med Ctr Blvd, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE | 2023年 / 64卷 / 05期
关键词
Epic Sepsis Prediction Model; Predicting Sepsis Score; sepsis alert; sepsis navigator; sepsis bundle; ORGAN FAILURE ASSESSMENT; SEPTIC SHOCK; MORTALITY; SCORE; DEFINITIONS; ANTIBIOTICS; GUIDELINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jemermed.2023.02.025
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
-background: The Epic Sepsis Prediction Model (SPM) is a proprietary sepsis prediction algorithm that calculates a score correlating with the likelihood of an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code for sepsis. Objective: This study aimed to assess the clinical impact of an electronic sepsis alert and navigator using the Epic SPM on time to initial antimicrobial delivery. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of a nonrandomized intervention of an electronic sepsis alert system and naviga-tor using the Epic SPM. Data from the SPM site (site A) was compared with contemporaneous data from hospitals within the same health care system (sites B-D) and histor-ical data from site A. Nonintervention sites used a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)-based alert with-out a sepsis navigator. Results: A total of 5368 admissions met inclusion criteria. Time to initial antimicrobial delivery from emergency department arrival was 3.33 h (interquar-tile range [IQR] 2.10-5.37 h) at site A, 3.22 h (IQR 1.97-5.60; p = 0.437, reference site A) at sites B-D, and 6.20 h (IQR 3.49-11.61 h; p < 0.001, reference site A) at site A histori-cal. After adjustment using matching weights, there was no difference in time from threshold SPM score to initial an-timicrobial between contemporaneous sites. Adjusted time to initial antimicrobial improved by 2.87 h ( p < 0.001) at site A compared with site A historical. Conclusions: Imple-mentation of an electronic sepsis alert system plus navigator using the Epic SPM showed no difference in time to initial antimicrobial delivery between the contemporaneous SPM alert plus sepsis navigator site and the SIRS-based electronic alert sites within the same health care system. (c) 2023 Else-vier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:584 / 595
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The value of the clinical impression in recognizing and treating sepsis patients in the emergency department
    van der Vegt, Anna Elizabeth
    Holman, Mirjam
    ter Maaten, Jan Cornelis
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2012, 19 (06) : 373 - 378
  • [42] Sepsis Prediction at Emergency Department Triage Using Natural Language Processing: Retrospective Cohort Study
    Brann, Felix
    Sterling, Nicholas William
    Frisch, Stephanie O.
    Schrager, Justin D.
    JMIR AI, 2024, 3
  • [43] Outcome prediction using the Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis score combined with procalcitonin for influenza patients
    Teng, Fei
    Wan, Tian-Tian
    Guo, Shu-Bin
    Liu, Xin
    Cai, Ji-Fei
    Qi, Xuan
    Liu, Wen-Xin
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 2019, 153 (11): : 411 - 417
  • [44] Quality initiative to improve emergency department sepsis bundle compliance through utilisation of an electronic health record tool
    Warstadt, Nicholus Michael
    Caldwell, J. Reed
    Tang, Nicole
    Mandola, Staci
    Jamin, Catherine
    Dahn, Cassidy
    BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [45] Objective Sepsis Surveillance Using Electronic Clinical Data
    Rhee, Chanu
    Kadri, Sameer
    Huang, Susan S.
    Murphy, Michael V.
    Li, Lingling
    Platt, Richard
    Klompas, Michael
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 37 (02): : 163 - 171
  • [46] Heart rate variability based machine learning models for risk prediction of suspected sepsis patients in the emergency department
    Chiew, Calvin J.
    Liu, Nan
    Tagami, Takashi
    Wong, Ting Hway
    Koh, Zhi Xiong
    Ong, Marcus E. H.
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (06)
  • [47] Machine Learning Model to Identify Sepsis Patients in the Emergency Department: Algorithm Development and Validation
    Lin, Pei-Chen
    Chen, Kuo-Tai
    Chen, Huan-Chieh
    Islam, Md Mohaimenul
    Lin, Ming-Chin
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2021, 11 (11):
  • [48] Prediction of the Development of Severe Sepsis Among Children With Intestinal Failure and Fever Presenting to the Emergency Department
    Eisenberg, Matthew
    Puder, Mark
    Hudgins, Joel
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2021, 37 (12) : E1366 - E1372
  • [49] Impact of a Combination Antibiotic Bag on Compliance With Surviving Sepsis Campaign Goals in Emergency Department Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
    Lorenzo, Michael P.
    MacConaghy, Lindsay
    Miller, Christopher D.
    Meola, Gregory
    Probst, Luke A.
    Pratt, Brian
    Steele, Jeff
    Seabury, Robert W.
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2018, 52 (03) : 240 - 245
  • [50] Cost and mortality impact of an algorithm-driven sepsis prediction system
    Calvert, Jacob
    Hoffman, Jana
    Barton, Christopher
    Shimabukuro, David
    Ries, Michael
    Chettipally, Uli
    Kerem, Yaniv
    Jay, Melissa
    Mataraso, Samson
    Das, Ritankar
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 20 (06) : 646 - 651